Does anyone remember when canada was building one of the world’s most advanced fighter jets and cancelled it because the americans said they would build a missile defense shield that would protect us instead?
Make the avro arrow great again!!!
The current President of the Divided states… a racketeer? A swindler?
ORLY.bmp
Throwing out the “.bmp” like it’s 2003, let’s go
“Ever since nuclear-armed intercontinental-range missiles were deployed in the 1950s, the United States (and its potential adversaries) have been vulnerable to nuclear attack. This is very unnerving, and has caused our leaders to search for some kind of technical fix that would change this situation by making it possible for us to defend ourselves against such an attack. Fixing this situation is also very appealing to the public. As a consequence, new systems for defending against ICBMs have been proposed again and again, and about half a dozen have been built, costing large amounts of money, in the hope that a technical fix could be found that would make us safe. But none of these efforts have been successful, because the difficulty of defending against nuclear-armed ICBMs is so great.”
https://www.404media.co/scientists-explain-why-trumps-175-billion-golden-dome-is-a-fantasy/
There’s no need for Canada to entertain this nonsense. Use the money on something important.
Especially when the USA keeps making clear that it is one of the two countries most likely to conduct hostile actions against Canada.
“I’ve got something for you it is shiny it is clean. Come let me adorn you with my yellow laser beam” — Mac frontalot
If they build something to attack missiles immediately after launch, how do the Americans even know who is the target?
Like, you’re choosing whether or not to shoot down a missile that launches in the general direction of Canada and America, but at launch you can’t see exactly which?
Do people still think defense in space is a dumb idea? Why?
I think it’s because the threat model against which a Golden Dome defends is just not that plausible any longer. Given the distances, a space-based ground defense can only protect from long-range attacks, like ICBMs. Unlike in the 80s, the technology to intercept and destroy ICBMs safely is now probably there, but the threat of all out nuclear war is much reduced.
You don’t think we’ll ever need some form of space defense?
We may very well in the future, of course! But maybe at the rate technology develops, it could be smarter to start working on it when the threat becomes visible.
I venture the uneducated guess that satellite to satellite might be the next space defense frontier ahead of space to ground.
Yeah satellite to satellite is definitely feasible and I think already being developed.
I just wouldn’t want to be late to the party when other countries have already started establishing viable space to ground weaponry. We take for granted that a lot of the domestic stability that the US is privileged to is due to an advanced military. Not saying we shouldn’t focus our money on more important things, but maintaining our status as a military superpower is unfortunately very important.
