In response to immigration raids by masked federal officers in Los Angeles and across the nation, two California lawmakers on Monday proposed a new state law to ban members of law enforcement from concealing their faces while on the job.

The bill would make it a misdemeanor for local, state and federal law enforcement officers to cover their faces with some exceptions, and also encourage them to wear a form of identification on their uniform.

“We’re really at risk of having, effectively, secret police in this country,” said state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), co-author of the bill.

  • TachyonTele
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1755 days ago

    This has to pass. And other states need to follow suit. It’s ridiculous any law enforcement can hide who they are unless they’re undercover.

    The thin blue line is how much responsibility they’re willing to accept. And it’s a very very thin line right now.

    • Gerald of Hillwood
      link
      fedilink
      English
      405 days ago

      Doesn’t matter if it passes. The president doesn’t abide by the law, so they don’t need to either.

    • chingadera
      link
      fedilink
      255 days ago

      Has an undercover cop ever really benefited the people?

      I’d love to be corrected on this, but when it comes to cops, I’ma doubt that real fucking fast.

      • Yeather
        link
        fedilink
        14 days ago

        Officers in my area wear face coverings when doing drug or gang related warrants to protect against retaliation.

  • @Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1395 days ago

    “Oh? You want to “detain” my student/employee/friend/partner? You have to prove you’re a law enforcement official and are legally-allowed to.”

    If that sounds unreasonable to anyone… you’re the extremist.

    • @entwine413@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      255 days ago

      It’s totally reasonable, but it’ll probably also get you deported to El Salvador. Or at the very least beat.

    • Problem is they aren’t required to prove it to you - some witness - unless it’s your child that’s involved, and they can take their sweet time providing proof to the person being detained as well, waiting until they’ve already thrown you to the ground and cuffed you.

  • @garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    105
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    This should also include identification on vehicles.

    None of this unmarked pickup truck or white van bullshit.

    • BigFig
      link
      fedilink
      English
      495 days ago

      This includes the “ghost letter” bullshit. They claim it’s so they can blend in and catch violations as they happen. Bro everyone can see a cop driving from a mile away by the way they drive, the reinforced grill, the slightly beefier trim to hide the installed lights, etc.

      • chingadera
        link
        fedilink
        255 days ago

        Oh you mean pre-crime, we absolutely need to violate your rights to prevent pre-crime.

      • @Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 days ago

        I honestly wouldn’t know. I live in Canada and police vehicles here are incredibly obvious and marked. Some unmarked vehicles do exist, but they are for detectives and people going after more serious crimes and dont care about parking tickets and jaywalkers.

  • Kühlschrank
    link
    fedilink
    English
    695 days ago

    Encourage them to wear identification? ENCOURAGE them?!? How that is not and has not always been mandatory is beyond me.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      It’s a state legislature attempting to regulate a federal agency. Even if it manages to make it to the Governor’s desk, you know Newsom will veto it, because he’s a cowardly little toad man who has never found a boat he was above licking. And if, by some miracle it survives the legislature and Newsom discovers his spine, the federal courts will bat this away overnight.

      All that is assuming Silicon Valley doesn’t have enough votes in the state house to smoother this proposal in committee.

      Why even worry about the language of a DOA bill? You’re not stopping ICE from Sacramento. Not with the current crop of liberal dorks and techbro shills running things.

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 days ago

        The mask part does not say encourage so I don’t see why the id part would be different.

      • @Artyom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        14 days ago

        I mean, the president did threaten him, so maybe he’ll grow a spine for his own safety.

      • Zoot
        link
        fedilink
        24 days ago

        Its already a hefty fine/jail time for impersonating a member of the law

        • I meant like ICE agents bringing fake ID so it had someone elses name on it and stuff. That wouldn’t be impersonating law enforcement since they technically are.

  • @foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    645 days ago

    You should not be under any obligation to assume or respect any proposed authority by a person unwilling to show you their face.

    This sentence should not need to be spoken.

    • @gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      285 days ago

      Conversely, I should not be required to show my face to anyone if I’m not trying to assert authority over them. Being a public servant means having a public identity, being a private citizen means you have the freedom to make choices about what you share.

      • @ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        35 days ago

        I agree, but there’s a difference between oversight and law enforcement there. If I am telling someone they need to justify restrictions in a behavior plan, that’s different than something for which someone else may be arrested. In the former example, I think they should be able to wear an N95 for health reasons.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      115 days ago

      You should not be under any obligation to assume or respect any proposed authority by a person unwilling to show you their face.

      Explaining this to the guy with a badge and a mask shoving a gun in my face.

      He’s screaming and cocking the weapon, while a few of his friends approach me with tasers and clubs, but I’m just going to stand here waving a copy of John Locke’s Social Contract while explaining that I am a Free Man On The Land and do not make joinder.

  • @this@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    In theory, anyone could forge a badge, claim to be ice, and literally kidnap people into sex trafficking or slavery and we wouldnt find out for quite a long time. That’s in addition to the already dangerous prospect of having unidentifiable police who are unaccountable.

    There should be passed ASAP. Should become a national law too but not gonna happen with this government. We need to pass this on a local and state level as much as possible.

      • @Buske@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        115 days ago

        mmmm People whom are know to hang out on an island full of under age sex trafficed girls, are now in power of the government. Oh of course it is happening, But its no longer limited to the island, and its government approved.

    • @Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      114 days ago

      Also many people may not necessarily know how a real ICE badge looks like. And fake badges are available for collectors and cosplayers alike. Also most people will not fully check or examine a badge or insignia, meaning by the time they realize it is fake it will be too late.

    • @Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      215 days ago

      Yep. There’s a non-zero chance that maga civilians are dressing tactical and kidnapping people they believe shouldn’t be here. I hope not, but there’s really no way to know either way at this point.

    • A face can be seen, recognized and recorded from a distance. Video doesn’t usually do any good with badges and other identification but cops and criminals both - or one and the same - risk being identified if they don’t have masks.

      • @arin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 days ago

        Sets a precedent against masking in general. As someone who still wants to avoid public infectious diseases like covid, flu, birdflu, and now measles, it makes us look like we’re trying to hide while we are just trying to protect ourselves with PPE.

  • @NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    295 days ago

    If this law is enacted, the Supreme Court will say that states can’t frustrate the operations of federal agents with these sorts of laws. Chief Justice Roberts will write the opinion and compare it to giving states the power to ban bulletproof vests from being worn by federal law enforcement and call it “a step from anarchy”. Clarence Thomas will then write a concurring opinion saying that federal agents acting on orders from the president should actually be immune for any type of civil or criminal liability for any of their actions, lawful or not.

    Then, when a Democratic president takes office the court will walk it back and say “well, actually, there’s this exception, and this exception, and that exception…”

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 days ago

      Then, when a Democratic president takes office the court will walk it back and say “well, actually, there’s this exception, and this exception, and that exception…”

      Or they won’t, because the Dem president will simply “not abuse such powers” due to their “adherence to decorum”.

      The SC made the president god-king while Biden was in office.

  • @Alenalda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I’m required to wear a photo id visible at all times while I’m at work as a cable lineman. Wear all the silly hats you want, long as your badge/Id visible and presented when asked.

    Wild these papers please people can’t figure it out for themselves.

  • @SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Badges should come with a QR code, linked to a government database, profiling official officers. Warrants should also get a QR code, with a justice’s signature, reasoning, and a short list of what activities are permitted by the warrant. The judicial branch controls their own database for the warrants and justices, while the state or federal governments have their own databases for their respective officers.

    Also, should these conceptual reforms happen, people should be able to immediately send a copy of the presented warrant and badges to their lawyers and agencies via a QR snapshot.

    • @throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 days ago

      Judges should be assigned RSA keys in a hardware module, and their public key available to everyone.

      Then we build a FOSS app downloading all the Public Keys of every judge, then they would sign warrants with their RSA key.

      A simple scan should also check the digital signature, and confirm its validity.

      Also there should be 3 hardware modules on the same keychain, each marked with a random number that the judge remembers. If they get kidnapped, they can use either of the 2 duress keys that would signal the warrants are illegitimate and automatically revoke the real key.

  • @Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    154 days ago

    This needs to happen, but

    “We’re really at risk of having, effectively, secret police in this country,”

    We’re way past this. Without due process, without judical oversight, without identification… we’re deep into actual secret police disappearing human beings off the street.

    We absolutely need to ban them from hiding their identities while “serving” the public, but at this point we need to outright ban them from the state. Senators and comptrollers being arrested, lawmakers being killed, chaos in the streets…

    Any state with any hope left of resisting the wave of fascism needs to outlaw ICE from having any jurisdiction within their borders. ICE detaining a human should be litigated and prosecuted as a kidnapping, because that’s exactly what it is. “It’ll start a war,” you might say. No it fucking won’t. It will either prevent a war, or the war has already started.

    • Banning it/them simultaneously goes too far and not far enough. Instead, explicitly legalize self-defense against anyone that fails or refuses to identify and validate their identity while performing official activities. Turn hiding your face and badge number into literal suicide.

      • @Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 days ago

        This just starts the war directly between civilians and ICE, and it still doesn’t address the underlying problem, which is that - masked or not - ICE agents are taking people off the streets and shipping them overseas to die, all without any oversight. The due process is still skipped over entirely. They might take the masks off, but the concentration camps will keep growing.

        At the very least, they need to ban ICE agents from detaining anyone without a judicial warrant. These “administrative” warrants and blatantly racist stop-and-frisk ambushes need to stop.