

I’ll hijack this comment since I dont have a news item to add, and there was a lot of “what if X is an upside to a Bolsonaro govt” that I wanted to respond to but the prev. thread become locked:
The contradictions that led to the pink wave will only accelerate with this recent assault by the USian bourgeois class. The US-condoned development of indigenous capitalist forces in Latam did much to shape the previous leftist movements in the continent towards social democracy and electoralism.
With the imperialist nature of the US of late, straight-up undermining the sovreignty of states it once maintained under the Monroe Doctrine, there’s a narrowing window of autonomy for electoralism and social-liberalism, and the national bourgeois classes of these countries are being subjegated to the USian bourgeosie. In turn , this has reframed the struggle into one that aims to usurp international capital, rather than the more attainable (and thus less necessarily-radical) goal of usurping (or taming) indigenous capital.
That isn’t something I would moralize as “good” or “bad”; being in the imperial core I’m not the one who will be subjected to either president. Many will face worse living conditions under Bolsonaro 2, and Lula’s presidency would bring continued respite for millions with the 6-1 policy repeal alone.
However, the prospect of further US consolidation of neocolonial power in its back yard is something that will help to dismantle it in the coming decades. Communists have opportunities to prepare and adapt to this new reality much more than anything the Worker’s Party can muster. Perhaps the reducing influence of electoral parties is something we should consider as hopeful, if nothing else.


















So neither will have much ability to do anything? What about if Flavio were to just do the Trump thing of ignoring everyone who tells him he cant do X because of legality?