https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture

deleted by creator

I didn’t see that one. Got a link?

I don’t get the joke. Please elaborate.

Interesting that you feel it’s not age appropriate. At what age do you think it would be appropriate?

Authoritarianism.

That’s one small use case. There are many other legitimate uses for them. Seems a bit odd to be so against them because they might possibly be used for nefarious purposes. Have you personally been victimized by a VPN user?

What’s wrong with VPNs for personal use? Serious question; I’ve never seen someone opposed to them.

They admitted it at CPAC:

Did a CPAC Banner Say, ‘We Are All Domestic Terrorists’?

Yes.

They have no job

Tell them to get a laptop

A few things to note:

1. it is a historical landmark building, you cannot just start doing shit to them without going through the proper channels.

2. it is in the city of Washington DC, and they need to be included in the process.

3. they have not provided plans, something needed for literally any construction project.

4. they are not even bothering to shield the site, so anyone from any intelligence agency from any country can watch.

5. Congress holds the purse strings per the US Constitution. The president cannot just unilaterally do this shit. This is what autocrats do.

Oh? And what are you doing?

Not sure what this fuss has been about, but I’m glad I switched when I did.

The fuss is about those who haven’t switched yet. They’re being forced to swallow a big, fat AI pill.

Yes.

The topic was potash tariffs until they gave an example using a different product. That’s how examples work.

https://www.gov.ie/en/department-of-culture-communications-and-sport/publications/basic-income-for-the-arts-pilot-scheme-guidelines/#eligibility

How’d the test go?

Why 2049 exactly? What happens that year?

your taste bud’s cravings are the the fault of […] not your body

Can you cite a reputable source to confirm this? Doesn’t seem right to me.

Did you ever see The Congress?