realitaetsverlust

Yeah, that’s the kind of conspiracy theorists I don’t like lmao.

Sure, but with “current” I mean the current understanding of science. We know the earth is round, but not because we discovered it, but because it’s the general consensus that is taught, barely anyone doubts it. Trying to - let’s call it “rediscover” - the scientific status quo is something I do like because it might always be the case that the people before were wrong. This is how new discoveries are made and I think that is a great thing. As an example, nobody believed that continents did actually move, and Wegener was ridiculed because he had no sure way to proof it, but at some point, people had the way to proof that he was actually right.

You know, I really like it when people think twice about the “current” state of science. Thinking “I don’t think that’s true. So I will check and verify” is a great thing and most people should do that. Thinking the earth is flat is fine - if you then go to verify.

The problem I have is if there is PLENTY of proof of things being a certain way that you just choose to ignore. Then you become an idiot.

Yes. Spotify got one aswell, and on my girlfriends phone, her default photo app provided her with a rewind that showed her certain topics she seems to enjoy photos of, in her case “cats” (containing plenty of images of my dog).

Probably not. It would’ve let to many people leaving windows earlier. Many people have thousands of bucks worth of games on steam. I don’t think they would’ve just left them.

The only thing why this is still the case is because microsoft is bundling everything in a single subscription and is also providing you with software that automatically keeps everything updated.

The software is shit, but companies using the entire ecosystem probably save money. Sadly.

Honestly, having ~1.3% of paying users is fine considering they are using all the other users as free learning material for their models.

Tatsächlich kann ich mit diesem einzelnen Wort nichts anfangen, es sei denn, du möchtest sagen, dass Europa bei EVs nicht komplett von China abgehängt wurde. In diesem Fall wärst du aber saudämlich.

So what, then I can still dislike the company lmao. What’s the point of hating something in advance?

Yeah because why like a company that has released banger after banger after banger without any MTX or other bullshit attached to it.

Removed by mod

These morons lost the EV race to china so they are trying their hardest to keep that oldass tech alive.

Lmao.

Retard was a legitimate word, then it became a slur so we invented “special needs” which is now also a slur, so we have “intellectual disability” (which isn’t even appropriate as you can be retarded without having an intellectual disability) which will inevitably be used as a slur at some point.

I think most people are just getting tired by getting tone policed more and more.

No “Sowwy”. To the gulag with you. >:(

Wait for the .ml pissheads talking about this being western propaganda

So, first of all, I barely ever had to work with d-bus directly - I used it a few times and it was fine to use.

Without any well-defined standards, a protocol is essentially useless and/or lawless

When I look for “D-Bus Specification”, I get this: https://dbus.freedesktop.org/doc/dbus-specification.html. This LOOKS like a proper documentation of the standard to me.

the general lax nature of how endpoints are intended to be defined … is a significant factor for why many applications are the way they are

I feel like this is the same complaint people have about other things, like PHP for example. They see shitty PHP code (like wordpress) and are like: “Oh my god PHP is such a shitty language because this application is written like shit”. But I don’t blame a language, a framework or a protocol for the failures of the users. I don’t feel like an application that close to the system core has to be absolutely “dummy proof”. At some point, we should just expect that people know what they’re doing, and if they don’t, we should blame them, not the underlying technology.

Honestly 80% of the article is ranting about developer not writing proper documentation or following specs which is not the fault of D-Bus. The only point that I agree with is the lack of security features, but that has never really been a thing back then. Half of the shit that was developed was completely insecure. Not saying that’s a good thing btw. But that can be fixed.

Terraform and Puppet. Not very simple to get into, but extremely powerful and reliable.

How do you notify yourself about the status of a container?

I usually notice if a container or application is down because that usually results in something in my house not working. Sounds stupid, but I’m not hosting a hyper available cluster at home.

Is there a “quick” way to know if a container has healthcheck as a feature.

Check the documentation

Does healthcheck feature simply depend on the developer of each app, or the person building the container?

If the developer adds a healthcheck feature, you should use that. If there is none, you can always build one yourself. If it’s a web app, a simple HTTP request does the trick, just validate the returned HTML - if the status code is 200 and the output contains a certain string, it seems to be up. If it’s not a web app, like a database, a simple SELECT 1 on the database could tell you if it’s reachable or not.

Is it better to simply monitor the http(s) request to each service? (I believe this in my case would make Caddy a single point of failure for this kind of monitor).

If you only run a bunch of web services that you use on demand, monitoring the HTTP requests to each service is more than enough. Caddy being a single point of failure is not a problem because your caddy being dead still results in the service being unusable. And you will immediately know if caddy died or the service behind it because the error message looks different. If the upstream is dead, caddy returns a 502, if caddy is dead, you’ll get a “Connection timed out”

if anybody could access a technology that helps them by magically destroying lives in another country far away, would you say the same thing?

Might be cruel to say it, but that’s called “progress”. The world needs to continue to evolve - latching to old jobs seems silly. We got rid off of blacksmiths because we don’t have the need anymore. Europe once had a huge horse stable industry spanning the entirety of central and western europe. We don’t have that anymore either, because we now have cars. We also don’t have any telegraph operators or switchboard operators (necessary for long distance communication back then), elevator operators or laundry washwomen - these jobs have all been made obsolete by technical advancements.

“It would be silly to ignore it as it makes things easier for me” seems quite short-sighted to me.

I think quite the opposite - it’s the long-sighted better option. Progress is never good for those negatively affected in the short term, but we can’t keep jobs around that aren’t really necessary anymore just for the sake of those people having a job.

And in this particular case, there’s not even any loss involved. They used their voice to train an AI, it was explicity part of the contract and they got paid for it. I honestly do not see the problem.