

Don’t.
Hello, tone-policing genocide-defender and/or carnist 👋
Instead of being mad about words, maybe you should think about why the words bother you more than the injustice they describe.
Have a day!


Don’t.


I just wrap bash snippets in bash -c '<snippet goes here>' and I have a great time with Fish that way.


Good. LLMs are a fucking blight on the world and every company that pushes that dogshit deserves to implode.


He’s a self-described democratic socialist, which is different from a social democrat, as you labeled him. Yes, many of his proposed policies are steps toward social democracy, rather than actual socialism, but I can’t expect one mayor, even in one of the largest cities, to somehow enact real socialism.
That distinction aside: all we can do is apply pressure and hope that Mamdani doesn’t meaningfully sell-out the working class in NYC.


Pedophile defender, Ted Cruz, doesn’t want you or your children to have privacy. I wonder why…


Rapist’s mentality.


Don’t forget Zach Cregger! We got Barbarian and Weapons.


Nice! TIL. Do you have any info you could share about how Minnesota’s privacy legislation compares to California’s or the EU?


Which is precisely why Zohran is necessary.


All conservatives are pedophiles.


The EU governing bodies are speaking out of both sides of their mouths if they claim that they want data sovereignty while simultaneously relying on an evil, American company to verify your “integrity” 🤡
You’ll never be sovereign if you rely on a for-profit entity that makes money by spying on people and selling your data.


Yeah. I was annoyed by this, but wouldn’t assume bad faith on the part of the Fennec devs.


If you are in the US, ROMs aren’t illegal either. You’re just required to rip them from a cartridge/disc you acquired legally (including second-hand purchases) and you can’t distribute it to others. It’s the latter part that makes it illegal (but not at all immoral). If you wanna do that last part, god bless. Fuck these companies.


I swear “review bombing” has to be an astroturfed term to delegitimize criticism when companies do shitty things.
It shifts the blame from the companies doing a shit thing (lacing their game with DRM/anti-cheat malware, making them run like shit unless you enable AI slop upscaling, shoveling AI “”“art”“” assets, MTX, etc.) to the customers that are rightly mad about the shit thing.


This is why I hope to see rule zero get shit-canned. It’s a naive vestige from a time long before we hit late-stage capitalism. Corporate interests have slithered their way into every facet of our lives and we should be working to make software that we write hostile to their practices as much as we can.
If that means that the organizations that have a stranglehold on Open Source™️ don’t like it, so be it. We can follow in the spirit of open source without the naivety or captured interests of organizations that define the arbitrary terms by which we categorize software licenses.


How would one DIY HDCP stripping? I’ve never looked into this.

I can’t tell if throwing a neither do we on the end would make it more or less menacing 🤔


Adopting that attitude toward anything is pretty self-defeating. It’s the same bad argument used against gun regulations in the US: “only misusers will have guns”.
Whether you agree with more or less regulations on anything, the “misusers will just do it anyway” is a bad argument.


Better to just roll over by default then, yeah /s
“Contributor” with the second greatest number of commits is Claude 🤡
DOA.