So now we’re being forced to have poorer performance and locked into buying more expensive hardware.

I’ll have to pass on this type of crap and vote with my wallet when ray tracing still isn’t there for the majority of pc gamers.

      • @tekato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55 months ago

        That link explains nothing, it just tells you what people are using. Why does a game requiring a GPU feature mean, by your own words, the death of optimization?

        • @Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I’ll chime in for the other commenter.

          Having ray tracing be “a minimum requirement” is batshit insane. Just make it an option and don’t require it for everyone.

          Ray tracing is not that widely available, so you shouldn’t just force it onto your whole player base.

          And while this might not sound like an optimization thing, it really looks like they couldn’t be bothered to develop their game with and without the ray tracing features.

          Edit: looking more into the numbers, they are all insane.

          • 8 cores with 16 threads as minimum?
          • 16GB RAM?
          • and a 100GB SSD again?

          I don’t really play AAA titles nowadays, but this is aweful and far from optimized. Doom 2016 needed half of that for every single metric!

            • @Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              55 months ago

              Yes, but the tech has not advanced that much since then. Also the game probably doesn’t look twice as good.

              Tbh. the game needing 8 cores is the most outrageous of the list, but the ray tracing is a close second, since that could easily be toggleable.

              • @SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                35 months ago

                Depending on how a game is made, no, ray casting may not be “easily toggleable”

                You wouldn’t complain about games requiring DirectX 12, or requiring DirectX 11, 10, whatever, in the past, so why complain about ray tracing? Modern games require modern GPU features, that is nothing new.

                • @Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  55 months ago

                  Maybe I wouldn’t, but I would definitely complain if this was a very new feature available in higher end GPUs.

                  DX12 is also software, it’s easily update able and modern hardware supports it.

                  But in the end I don’t give a fuck, since I just won’t play doom then.

                  • @SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    15 months ago

                    It’s been a standard for graphics cards for around a decade now, it’s not just high end GPUs

                    And, yeah, you don’t need to play newest titles. But devs do want to move with the times and utilize modern features. This is nothing new, and was worse in the past, in fact. Things have slowed down from how they used to be 20 years ago.

                • @Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  35 months ago

                  In a doom game ray tracing should not be used for registering hits, since most if not all of the projectiles are visible and fly slower than light.

          • @Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -55 months ago

            Nobody buying $80 games doesn’t have all this shit. You guys are living in a bubble. Everyone has rtx these days. The ones that don’t weren’t going to buy Doom anyway.