/home/pineapplelover to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-24 months agoThe Pebble Has Been Brought Backstore.repebble.comexternal-linkmessage-square134fedilinkarrow-up1494arrow-down118cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldpebble@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1476arrow-down1external-linkThe Pebble Has Been Brought Backstore.repebble.com/home/pineapplelover to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-24 months agomessage-square134fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldpebble@lemmy.ml
minus-square@n2burns@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish6•4 months agoYour response says, “not epaper” which is categorically wrong. I assume you meant to say “eink”
minus-squareFaridlinkfedilinkEnglish3•4 months agoAs I mentioned earlier, whether a screen type is considered e-paper is subjective. And in my opinion, reflective LCD isn’t a type of e-paper. You may disagree, but it’s not “categorically” wrong.
Your response says, “not epaper” which is categorically wrong. I assume you meant to say “eink”
As I mentioned earlier, whether a screen type is considered e-paper is subjective. And in my opinion, reflective LCD isn’t a type of e-paper. You may disagree, but it’s not “categorically” wrong.