db0M to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com • 1 month agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up192arrow-down166
arrow-up126arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0M to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com • 1 month agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)linkfedilink10•1 month agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilink-1•1 month ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilink-2•edit-21 month agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
Accelerationism is a religion.
this isn’t about accelerationism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
you’re making that up
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism