• @Tiresia@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    318 hours ago

    That’s really not true. Paper production takes a lot of (often non-renewable) energy, ink usually consists of non-renewable chemicals, paper is often harvested from nonrenewable destruction of forests (especially in the US with Trump’s plans to cut down national forests), paper production belches a lot of pollution into the air and pollutes a lot of water, etc.

    • @Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      018 hours ago

      The energy can be obtained from renewable sources any time we decide to quit fucking around and make it happen, wood pulp can be replaced with hemp far more easily than that and requires less chemical treatment in the process. There are no similar options for mitigating the negative impact of mining or making our supply of those metals any bigger.

        • @Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          08 hours ago

          Recycling still consumes energy which can be just as non-renewable as the energy used for making paper, and the impact of mining is far greater than hemp farming even at its worst. Try harder.