@fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 30 days agoDiddy could be ousted from courtroom for attempting to influence jurors during trialwww.usatoday.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1130arrow-down12
arrow-up1128arrow-down1external-linkDiddy could be ousted from courtroom for attempting to influence jurors during trialwww.usatoday.com@fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 30 days agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareBob Robertson IX linkfedilinkEnglish9•30 days agoNot to defend the guy, but isn’t that the whole point of a trial (to influence the jurors in the courtroom)?
minus-square@Ledericas@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish22•30 days agothey probably meant jury tampering, either by buying them off, or giving them something in return for favorable vote.
minus-squarew3dd1elinkfedilink4•29 days agoThe article says it was because he was looking at the jurors and nodding. I’m sure what I’m picturing wasn’t what happy because I didn’t understand it either.
minus-square@Ledericas@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish1•29 days agosounds like potential tampering, so they probably going to need new jurors.
minus-square@kreskin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink12•edit-229 days agoTheres rules, Bob. They arent optional. As a defendent you follow those rules.
minus-squareBob Robertson IX linkfedilinkEnglish1•29 days agoI know, I just found the wording of the headline to be funny.
Not to defend the guy, but isn’t that the whole point of a trial (to influence the jurors in the courtroom)?
they probably meant jury tampering, either by buying them off, or giving them something in return for favorable vote.
The article says it was because he was looking at the jurors and nodding. I’m sure what I’m picturing wasn’t what happy because I didn’t understand it either.
sounds like potential tampering, so they probably going to need new jurors.
Theres rules, Bob. They arent optional. As a defendent you follow those rules.
I know, I just found the wording of the headline to be funny.