@MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world to You Should Know@lemmy.world • edit-27 days agoYSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failedwww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square440fedilinkarrow-up11.2Karrow-down1338
arrow-up1866arrow-down1external-linkYSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failedwww.bbc.com@MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world to You Should Know@lemmy.world • edit-27 days agomessage-square440fedilink
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilink1•6 days agodoesn’t sound like the protest had any impact. sounds like the votes were the only thing that mattered.
minus-square@finitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-1•6 days agoBy that logic no protest has ever had any impact. You sound like a real bootlicker rn.
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilink3•6 days agoI’m not anti protest. I’m challenging the assertion that the Iraq war protests worked.
minus-square@finitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•6 days agoYou have challenged the assertion that protests in any way affect the outcome of elections or what choices politicians make.
doesn’t sound like the protest had any impact. sounds like the votes were the only thing that mattered.
By that logic no protest has ever had any impact. You sound like a real bootlicker rn.
nonviolence protects the state
So does being anti-protest, bootlicker.
I’m not anti protest. I’m challenging the assertion that the Iraq war protests worked.
You have challenged the assertion that protests in any way affect the outcome of elections or what choices politicians make.
anyone can read what I wrote and see this is a lie