@Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 days agoJudge backs AI firm over use of copyrighted bookswww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1192arrow-down16
arrow-up1186arrow-down1external-linkJudge backs AI firm over use of copyrighted bookswww.bbc.com@Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 days agomessage-square58fedilink
minus-square@bob_omb_battlefield@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish6•3 days agoYeah, I guess the debate is which is the lesser evil. I didn’t make the original comment but I think this is what they were getting at.
minus-squareNomad ScrylinkfedilinkEnglish7•3 days agoAbsolutely. The current copyright system is terrible but an AI replacement of creators is worse.
minus-square@Grimy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-23 days agoYes precisely. I don’t see a situation where the actual content creators get paid. We either get open source ai, or we get closed ai where the big ai companies and copyright companies make bank. I think people are having huge knee jerk reactions and end up supporting companies like Disney, Universal Music and Google.
Yeah, I guess the debate is which is the lesser evil. I didn’t make the original comment but I think this is what they were getting at.
Absolutely. The current copyright system is terrible but an AI replacement of creators is worse.
Yes precisely.
I don’t see a situation where the actual content creators get paid.
We either get open source ai, or we get closed ai where the big ai companies and copyright companies make bank.
I think people are having huge knee jerk reactions and end up supporting companies like Disney, Universal Music and Google.