• brianary@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    If it’s not compelling enough for you to read it to support your position, why would I read it?

      • brianary@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I can tell you’re really proud of these replies, but I’m afraid they don’t actually make sense.

        You were hoping to prove a logical implication (if P then Q), but you feel it was disproved since the premise didn’t happen. However, “not P” doesn’t actually prove anything about the implication.

        Anyway, no one is really accomplishing anything constructive here. Good luck!