adultswim.fan
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Blender Dumbass@px.madiator.com to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 个月前

Chat Control Violates More Kids than Encrypted CSAM

blenderdumbass.org

external-link
message-square
16
link
fedilink
102
external-link

Chat Control Violates More Kids than Encrypted CSAM

blenderdumbass.org

Blender Dumbass@px.madiator.com to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 个月前
message-square
16
link
fedilink
We all know that when politicians tell us to think of the children it is always a bullshit manipulation technique. But I rarely see people actually break down the issue well when it comes to EU's Chat Control.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 个月前

    Fuck reading a website that upts a popup that puts a rant about my hardware across 1/4 of their content

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 个月前

      I like how the website doesn’t even work anymore.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 个月前

        seems to work fine

    • Blender Dumbass@px.madiator.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 个月前

      Let me guess, you got the iWarning? lol

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 个月前

    Bad article, but the point does stand: breaking encryption is stupid, and csam is just an excuse, nothing more, no politician gives a shit about kids

  • not quite01(they/them)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 个月前

    How fucking distasteful is that cover of the article

    • Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 个月前

      The images of the kid from E.T.?

    • crandlecan@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 个月前

      Wtf I hadn’t even noticed it 😡

  • crandlecan@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 个月前

    This was, logically, a very badly written article. If anything, reading this article steers me towards breaking encryption, a position I would never take.

    • Blender Dumbass@px.madiator.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 个月前

      Please explain

  • sakuragasaki46@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 个月前

    The deal is:

    When CSAM is a thing, a child has already been violated.

    When conversation is being controlled, government or whoever reads all of your messages.

    It means cops can CSAM you, and you can do nothing since cops are “protected people”

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    4 个月前

    i’m sure the kids who were abused would say otherwise

    • Luke@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 个月前

      As a person who was sexually abused as a child, please have the courage to state your opinions without using abused kids as a logical crutch.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 个月前

      Encryption abused them?

      Removing encryption is opening a Pandora’s box that won’t protect real victims for even a second.

      • sakuragasaki46@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 个月前

        victims need privacy and secure communication indeed

    • icelimit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 个月前

      Encryption doesn’t abuse kids; pedophiles do. There’re plenty of documented ones in office actually voting for the removal of your (human) rights to privacy.

Privacy@lemmy.ml

privacy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.ml

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

  • Lemmy.ml libre_culture
  • Lemmy.ml privatelife
  • Lemmy.ml DeGoogle
  • Lemmy.ca privacy

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 589 users / day
  • 1.8K users / week
  • 5.14K users / month
  • 14.4K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 43.9K subscribers
  • 4.01K Posts
  • 94.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • k_o_t@lemmy.ml
  • Yayannick@lemmy.ml
  • ranok@sopuli.xyz
  • tmpod@lemmy.pt
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org