Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 months agoInspirationallemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square34linkfedilinkarrow-up1441arrow-down18
arrow-up1433arrow-down1imageInspirationallemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square34linkfedilink
minus-squarezxqwas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·6 months agoIn a frictionless vaccuum 45° would be max range.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·6 months agoYeah you actually want a bit less then that.
minus-squareOoops@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·edit-26 months agoUnless you use modern artillery. Then you want to aim even higher because at those ranges/heights it’s beneficial to reach less dense air layers quickly.
In a frictionless vaccuum 45° would be max range.
Yeah you actually want a bit less then that.
Unless you use modern artillery. Then you want to aim even higher because at those ranges/heights it’s beneficial to reach less dense air layers quickly.