Cool, cool cool cool. Nothing dystopian about that at all.

  • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    14 hours ago

    So you acknowledge that the data exists, what you are scared of is being able to search it? Spooky stuffs.

    • mriormro@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      So you acknowledge that bullets exist, what you are scared of is being able to continuously fire them at an extremely high rpm? Spooky stuff.

      You fucking knuckle dragger.

      • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You never considered that bullets could be fired at a high rate until an article you saw on lemmy told you to be scared of it?

    • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I’m going to say that this is actually spooky.

      Not that it’s unreasonable, but that the scale of what AI can surveil is so vast that there’s no more personal security-via-obscurity.

      It used to be that unless someone had a reason to start looking at you, anything you did online or off was effectively impossible to search. You might be caught on some store’s CCTV, Or your cell provider might have location pings, but that wasn’t online for anyone and needed a warrant to have the police use it to track your activities. Now cities are using Flock and similar tools to enable tracking vehicles across the country without any reason, and stores are using cloud-service AI cameras to attempt to track your mood as you move through the store. These tools can and have been abused.

      Now, due to the harvesting of this data for AI, anything that’s ever been recorded (video footage, social media posts, etc) and used as training data can be correlated much more easily, long after it occurred, and without needing to be law enforcement with a warrant.

      I’d call that spooky.

      • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        So you think private and opensource intelligence spontaneously came into existence in the last 5 years because of AI?

        • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          No, that’s not what I said. Widespread data collection and searching used to be something only state actors could accomplish and there were at least theoretically guard rails. Now the barrier of entry has been seriously reduced, the data is owned by a corporation, and being fed to AI. That has a chilling effect as well as being ripe for abuse.

          I don’t see an upside.

          • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Widespread data collection and searching used to be something only state actors could accomplish and there were at least theoretically guard rails

            So you just make shit up as you go? You are projecting how you think things should work into reality as if it were fact. But now you are learning how it actually works and what really scares you is the shattering of the illusion you sold yourself. I mean it should be pretty apparent Google and Facebook are tools of the US government they always have been.

            • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              “Anyone could already do this, so why bother being worried that it’s easier now” they said.

              I still don’t get your angle. Why are you defending this, or at the very least downplaying it’s impacts? You seem to also be aggravated by this data collection and spying, so why are you so mad that other people are catching on?

              “Oh, I’m so smart” they said. Enjoy your useless internet points?

              The situation is actually different now, in the last few years. This is less relevant to the OP, but we/they are building automated snitches that will tattle on you, and more importantly be wrong with a statistical significance. See Flock mistaking license plates and calling the police on innocent people. Sure, we might catch a few violent criminals, but when your government decides that your online activity complaining about them is now criminal, your data can be correlated in real time in a way that wasn’t possible in our parent’s time.

              Your dismissal of this seems insane. Stop arguing with me about how long it’s been possible and help me/us fight against it.

              • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                27 minutes ago

                “Anyone could already do this, so why bother being worried that it’s easier now” they said.

                The first thing you do is make shit up so I am not going to bother engaging with whatever else you got to say.