• buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That didn’t work out as well as Reagan thought it would. And has been fucking up our air travel situation for the last 40 years. To do it again would literally kill air travel in the country for the next 30 years. People would literally stop flying.

    Edit: to be clear, I’m not saying this isn’t going to happen. Trump is a fucking moron who thinks of himself as the second coming of Reagan. So he will 100% happily fire all of the traffic controllers we have if they even breathe the word “strike”. I’m just outlining what a god-awful fucked up future we have in store for us.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      To do it again would literally kill air travel in the country for the next 30 years. People would literally stop flying.

      From a climate perspective, that would be fantastic.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Given everything you know about America, do you really think it would be fantastic for the climate?

        Because personally, I’m pretty sure people would just end up driving instead of flying, which is generally worse for the environment. Rich people would still be flying in private jets. We’d just see less commercial flights (and nearly zero general aviation), which would largely be replaced by people taking long road trips

        • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          If it were replaced with massive investment into public transport and new dedicated high speed rail between US cities, it’d be a huge net positive.

          A man can dream, anyway.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          It may still have a net positive on emissions if only barely, a flight to Disneyworld gets canceled and not replaced is generally good, same thing with non essential conferences and conventions. But it could also respin up road trip culture, IE packing into and going to Carlsbad Caverns instead of flying out to the Florida.

    • BigBenis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I say do it! Air travel is a huge waste and harmful to the environment. Maybe this will finally lead to better trains!

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Air travel is worse than trains, better than driving. Knowing America, people would only end up driving more. I personally don’t think that’s a good thing

        • BigBenis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          People fly because it’s the fastest means of travel. The fastest trains will never be as fast as flying but people are also never going to be able to drive as fast as high speed rail.