With climate change looming, it seems so completely backwards to go back to using it again.

Is it coal miners pushing to keep their jobs? Fear of nuclear power? Is purely politically motivated, or are there genuinely people who believe coal is clean?


Edit, I will admit I was ignorant to the usage of coal nowadays.

Now I’m more depressed than when I posted this

    • SquareBear@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m looking forward to seeing your Instagram snaps once you move back to pripyat permanently. Statistics never tell the full story.

    • riley0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      If you’re referring to the nukes-are-statistically-safe argument, then to be fair, you also have to take into account the scale of their failures.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Right it would be something involving number of people harmed, for number of joules or watt-hours of energy produced. How much injury, death, etc is there on a per-unit basis. That would be how you’d get a probability of harm. Then you could compare it numerically with other forms of energy to see which is the safest, statistically speaking.