Yuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 12 days agoFood becoming more calorific but less nutritious due to rising carbon dioxidewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up183arrow-down11cross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
arrow-up182arrow-down1external-linkFood becoming more calorific but less nutritious due to rising carbon dioxidewww.theguardian.comYuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 12 days agomessage-square16linkfedilinkcross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
minus-squarePili [any, any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·12 days agoFuuuuck right when I’m cutting of course
minus-squareDragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·12 days agoFWIW caloric information is less accurate than it seems, but precision is more important. If you’re consistently incorrect in the right direction, it’s just as good as being correct.
minus-squarerobot_dog_with_gun [they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·12 days agoyeah when i was doing a spreadsheet i made sure all the systematic error was slightly overestimating in and underestimating out and it was quite effective.
minus-squarestink@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·12 days agoI started doing 5:2 fasting 600 calories / day then baseline calories the other days. I don’t even track what I eat on the days I’m not eating 600 calories and tbh I feel great.
Fuuuuck right when I’m cutting of course
FWIW caloric information is less accurate than it seems, but precision is more important.
If you’re consistently incorrect in the right direction, it’s just as good as being correct.
yeah when i was doing a spreadsheet i made sure all the systematic error was slightly overestimating in and underestimating out and it was quite effective.
I started doing 5:2 fasting
600 calories / day then baseline calories the other days. I don’t even track what I eat on the days I’m not eating 600 calories and tbh I feel great.