The water thing is kinda BS if you actually research it though.
Like… if the guy orders a steak their meal would have used more water than an entire year of talking to ChatGPT.
See the various research compiled in this post: The AI water issue is fake (written by someone against AI and advocating for its regulation, but upset at the attention a strawman is getting that they feel weakens more substantial issues because of how easily it’s exposed as frivolous hyperbole)
Meant to say the shill they were propping up. The guy they claim is anti-AI is an advocate for it. I fixed the original comment. Thanks for pointing out the bad link.
Needs a gallon of water to answer a simple question and is burning civilization down as it does. Yup, that’s you’re AI girlfriend.
Yeah, doesn’t answer the question at all.
Totally missed that. That’s great.
So she should have been adding more cups each time she talked.
*your
Youri
The water thing is kinda BS if you actually research it though.
Like… if the guy orders a steak their meal would have used more water than an entire year of talking to ChatGPT.
See the various research compiled in this post: The AI water issue is fake (written by someone against AI and advocating for its regulation, but upset at the attention a strawman is getting that they feel weakens more substantial issues because of how easily it’s exposed as frivolous hyperbole)
Bullshit. Andy Manley is absolutely NOT against AI.
https://andymasley.substack.com/p/ai-can-obviously-create-new-knowledge
The dude is a total quack
What’s that link supposed to prove?
It proves that the shill you’re propping up as an anti-AI advocate, is a pro-AI propagandist.
I ain’t propping up anybody.
All that link shows me is a text box.
Meant to say the shill they were propping up. The guy they claim is anti-AI is an advocate for it. I fixed the original comment. Thanks for pointing out the bad link.
Which parts of those linked posts do you believe are incorrect? And where does that belief come from?