• frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    5 months ago

    Two reasons. First, you don’t know that that guy really is a doctor. He could be some random crazy person. Second, if she lives, she can sue.

    • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not making excuses for a fascist preventing a doctor from getting to someone who’s bleeding to death is free.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not making snarky comments is also free. They asked why, I answered. I never said it was a good reason or any excuse.

    • Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That never happens, also the response isn’t “no” it’s any sort of question to discern if they are telling the truth.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      First, you don’t know that that guy really is a doctor.

      Not an acceptable reason. I’d actually expect that medical personnel probably do in fact carry some sort of documentation that identifies them as such, likely for this very reason.

      Second, if she lives, she can sue.

      So…they want 1st degree murder rather than manslaughter charges. Actively blocking medical aid demonstrates explicit premeditated intent.