• SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    I doubt it’s that high. US grows a ridiculous amount of corn on perverse incentives, only 1.5% of it is edible. Most soy is not eaten, it’s processed for oils.

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is looking at global data. Most countries are a lot less wasteful than the US. It also completely disregards waste food, though it says it only makes up 5% of global caloric production.

      According to the article, the US produces 14% of all agricultural calories on Earth. 28% of this is spent on non-food purposes, while 17% is spent on food but not animal feed, compared to 15% and 45% globally. This means that while the US produces twice as much calories per acre of farmland than the global average, it can actually feed fewer people per acre than average.

    • WalleyeWarrior@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The article is all cropland, not just corn. So it includes things like wheat production in the western great plains, fruit and vegetables in the Imperial and Central Valleys in California, apple farms in Washington and Michigan, oranges in Florida and California. But you are correct that most corn, soy, and alfalfa are grown for non-human consumption

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      the paper says 49% goes to humans, and 52% goes to oil and animal feed… so something doesn’t add up