• GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      That leaves plenty of room to be sued actually. It provides limited liability, not zero liability, and would be put to the test almost immediately.

      • Entertainmeonly (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        It has not though and it’s been on the law books since the fucking 90s. Get real. If it was going to fail in court it would have already.

        Stop championing for shitty companies.

        • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          But we’re in a topic about supermarkets throwing their food away instead of donating it lol

          Also it wouldn’t “fail” in court because like I said, it is limited liability. It can fine you no liability sometimes, full liability other times.

          No one is “championing” anything, merely explaining what prevents what is being discussed.