The Fediverse might be getting their own mashups of Tiktok, YouTube, and Vine sooner than anyone thought, thanks to the work of one prolific dev spearheading an effort. The best part? He’s helping other projects in the space, too.

  • @Asudox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Okay but storing videos is very expensive. Even in its compressed form. Even images are being disabled in some instances in lemmy because of this. And videos are hundreds of images composed together. Who will run them?

    • Sean TilleyOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      237 months ago

      It’s less expensive than you would think. Object Storage is actually really, really cheap in a lot of cases. I host a PeerTube instance, and while it does cost me money every month, the cost is decently offset by recurring donations, as well as the savings that Object Storage brings.

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        107 months ago

        This. It’s getting it out of storage that’s expensive (if you’re doing the cloud thing - if doing colo, probably just then down to cost of drives after a short time).

    • @spaduf@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      97 months ago

      I think it’s worth considering a model where one might be expected to provide hosting for their own video. Certainly not necessary now but probably will be if/when video on fedi takes off

      • @Asudox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        147 months ago

        I guess. An average 30 sec video in Tiktok is around 10mb. So with a S3 storage. For a monthly budget of 10€, you could roughly store 500k of those videos. Taking also account the server bills (10-20€) That would be 30€ per month. For a million of those videos would be 20€ so monthly around 50€ euros. For people that really want to host one. I guess you could. But it’s definitely more expensive than something like Lemmy.

  • @CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    417 months ago

    Why do short videos have to loop automatically with no way to turn it off? Who the hell decided that was a good idea and why has every other app followed suit?

    I especially hate the ones designed to loop because they think it’s “so clever”.

    “Never play with liquid mercury
    It’s really bad for your health and shit
    That’s why you should…”

    🤮

    • @MBM@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      157 months ago

      It’s like the darkest pattern. Making it so that quitting has to be a conscious choice. I see why amoral companies would use it, don’t know why FOSS would too.

    • @Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      117 months ago

      Because they increase usage of the apps. People just doom scroll and keep playing.

      It’s a horrible thing IMO

        • Resol van Lemmy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          Instagram does it automatically for you now with no way to permanently turn it off.

          This is the thing that made me delete the app after years of consideration.

    • Riskable
      link
      fedilink
      English
      167 months ago

      This might not necessarily be the case for much longer with storage costs finally reaching certain thresholds.

      2TB SSDs only cost ~$100 and you can cram a lot of SSDs into a tiny space with only a minimal amount of cooling (still need a fan but just a fan).

      The next bottleneck to overcome is upload bandwidth. Too many providers offer asynchronous service with weirdly low/slow upload limitations. However, that too might be changing over the next few years as DOCSIS 4.0 supports 10Gbit down/6Gbit up (DOCSIS 3.1 only supported ~1Gbit up). An important note about DOCSIS 4.0 is that in order to take advantage of it’s improved features (on the ISP end) you need to provide more upload bandwidth to the client (well, you can still cap it at the router but at that point the ISP is just being an asshole instead of actually “managing bandwidth”).

      • bufalo1973
        link
        fedilink
        English
        97 months ago

        And don’t forget Peertube already uses P2P to spread the load between the server and the viewers.

  • @spaduf@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    237 months ago

    Regarding Sup: dansup has mentioned that he’s put the project on hold until the new EU guidelines around interoperability (targeting whatsapp) are available.

  • wowiamreallyamazed
    link
    fedilink
    English
    167 months ago

    Omggg!!1!1! This is what I’ve been waiting for! Yay. I wonder if floptropica will adopt this platform.

    • Scrubbles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 months ago

      I’m giving it a shot now. I kind of like it, like what insta could have been

  • TheMonkeyLord
    link
    fedilink
    English
    107 months ago

    Pixelfed is really interesting, and this sounds like a fun project!

    The only problem major problem I have encountered with trying to use defederated social medias, outside of Lemmy, like it and mastadon has been the lack of discover ability. I guess I don’t know how to properly utilize the platforms, but I never find much that is particular to my interests

  • @MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    People keep asking about storage and that’s a valid concern. I remember a while ago Linus made a video about a crypto that can be mined with storage. So he made a huge raid of old drives. I wonder if something like this could or would be practical for a decentralized storage solution. Like… Encourage people to set up NAS’s that can be used sort of like torrent seeding for a decentralized video platform and reward them with crypto.

    I dunno… Just thinking out loud.

    Edit: Jeez hit a nerve with the crypto thing, huh? Then what’s the solution? Storage costs money. So ads? Subscription cost?

    • TurtleJoe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      No, crypto is never the solution for anything. Its use cases are limited to drugs and scams, which are sometimes the same things.

  • @Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    47 months ago

    Short form and vertical format both suck, so meh. I’d rather they did proper video hosting to compete with regular Youtube, though that would cost way more to pull off so I’m not holding my breath.

      • @Kyyrypyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        67 months ago

        I would so much like to love peertube, but I have yet to find any instance that hosts the trash reevant to my interests. Mostly they either are filled with reuploads from YouTube, or are full of radicalized conspiracy theories (which I encounter very rarely on any other form of fediverse).

        And then there is the “dumploads”, which makes the instances seem like they only have one active contributor, as they dump like 60 videos right after another, resulting the frontpages to have just one note content. This, however, could be gixed by otion to group conecutive uploads as “[latest video] and [n] other videos from [user]”, which would help to find more diverse content, as well as discourage dumping.

        Then again, that is only my opinion, and if PeerTube is fine for others, who am I to complain. It just doesn’t seem to be for me :/

        • Sean TilleyOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 months ago

          There are a handful of decent instances, but you really have to dig to find stuff, sadly. I run Spectra Video and basically have to curate sign-ups and which servers we follow.

          It helps cut down on a lot of the crap, but it takes work.

      • @small44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        With the cost of hosting videos and almost all instances not accepting registration. Peertube has zero chance to replace youtube. The best it could be is complementary to youtube

        • @Omniraptor@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Peertube actually uses some pretty nifty p2p tech (not quite BitTorrent iirc but same principle) to mitigate load from popularity spikes.

          • @small44@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17 months ago

            What about how hard it is to have an account on any instance. Pwople can’t even comment on video without an account

            • Iapar
              link
              fedilink
              English
              26 months ago

              Can’t even? Where is it possible to comment without an account?

              But not being able to create an account easily is a good point that speaks against the concept.

              But I would guess there are instance still open for registration.

  • @XPost3000@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26 months ago

    “Pixelfed”, “sup.”, “Loops” honestly Pixelfed is like the only fediverse brand with moderately modern naming schemes, like I could imagine Loops and sup gaining actually traction outside of Linux folks, would honestly be a huge win for fedi

  • @XPost3000@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26 months ago

    Honestly the occasional reposted tik tok is something I really miss from reddit, in the right community scrolling through the top of the week was an absolute blast!

    I’m really glad to see some short form video fedi service joining the fediverse, hopefully it pans out well and gets enough users to have consistent content!