Anarchist is a braindead way of thinking. Systems need to be n place for organization and allocation. You think those tribal societies didn’t have systems?
Who is “we” in this situation? Is it a post revolution United States? Is it a hypothetical island? Is this anarcho-syndicist, mutualist, collectivist, etc? There’s more than one school of thought for anarchism
Why are we negotiating money in a moneyless society?
Focusing on the wrong thing. It doesn’t matter what it is, or even who you’re trying to get it from, the point is that you need something another group of people has. How are you going to get it?
Everybody in your town is just going to leave their homes and walk to the nearest town together; or are you going to send a representative to that town to negotiate trade for you?
actually a good question. From my understanding it’s the wronged party and they present it to their local community. Or you advocate for people who are being overlooked.
The model is for smaller communities so that if justice is done poorly then people interjecting can correct it
Who is the authority that controls the network your bittorrent client uses? Who is the authority that forces you to share? Who is the authority that keeps bad actors from ruining it for everyone else? There isn’t one. Authority and violence are not the only models for providing systems. The fact that you can’t even conceive of consentual systems is kind of scary, like there’s an important piece of your mind missing.
I feel bad for you, you don’t know how to admit your wrong. There are people that manage which code gets in there and doesn’t. The fact you can’t admit that is sad. Gl in life fr
No, it’s a peer-to-peer protocol that does not depend on a “hub” or central server. Like, very famously. Trackers exist to facilitate peer discovery, but the protocol allows clients to discover each other through DHT, “distributed lookup network,” with no central server. Maybe you’re too young to remember gnutella but BitTorrent was created to be invulnerable to disruption by doing away with all central servers. Fucking ask an AI before you start insulting people’s intelligence, you don’t know what you’re talking about.
What about tor? What about i2p? What about gnutella? What about mojonation? What about the federation of Lemmy servers, who is in charge of that? What about FreeNet? What about Bitcoin? What about Ethereum? Bro, do you even code???
Finding your thesis convincing requires you to be utterly ignorant of the world you are living in, blinded by your own baggage and bullshit and too cowardly to be curious.
This troglodyte needs hierarchy to feel ok and can’t imagine functioning without it. Not everyone can imagine a future they’ve never experienced. Many people were never taught critical thought and logic and your neural centers atrophy with disuse. It’s not their fault and we need to figure out how to deal with them before revolution and then care for them after.
Anarchist is a braindead way of thinking. Systems need to be n place for organization and allocation. You think those tribal societies didn’t have systems?
We are anti-authority, not anti-organisation ._.
And who is gonna be the authority to organize everything?
You do not need an authority figure to organise stuff. We use the consensus model for decision making.
Scope out this dude’s comments. He won’t be reading any of that
welp, i tried 🤷
I never blame anyone for opening up to others in good faith. You’re part of why this site doesn’t suck
who decides if there is an issue and who presents it to who?
Anyone can bring up a issue forward to the group
how?
We need to renegotiate prices on lithium with China. How do I do that?
Who is “we” in this situation? Is it a post revolution United States? Is it a hypothetical island? Is this anarcho-syndicist, mutualist, collectivist, etc? There’s more than one school of thought for anarchism
Why are we negotiating money in a moneyless society?
Focusing on the wrong thing. It doesn’t matter what it is, or even who you’re trying to get it from, the point is that you need something another group of people has. How are you going to get it?
Everybody in your town is just going to leave their homes and walk to the nearest town together; or are you going to send a representative to that town to negotiate trade for you?
How are you going to decide who represents you?
Uh oh, you’ve just reinvented government
I dunno, am not an economist 🤷
sounds like you need an economist to represent you
How are you going to choose which economist represents you?
↑↑↑
actually a good question. From my understanding it’s the wronged party and they present it to their local community. Or you advocate for people who are being overlooked.
The model is for smaller communities so that if justice is done poorly then people interjecting can correct it
And whose the guy put all these rules and systems in place?
The collective will decide how to run things
Can you point to 1 example of this working?
This is how we organized for most of our existence
So you don’t have evidence, ok just double checking.
Who is the authority that controls the network your bittorrent client uses? Who is the authority that forces you to share? Who is the authority that keeps bad actors from ruining it for everyone else? There isn’t one. Authority and violence are not the only models for providing systems. The fact that you can’t even conceive of consentual systems is kind of scary, like there’s an important piece of your mind missing.
I feel bad for you, you don’t know how to admit your wrong. There are people that manage which code gets in there and doesn’t. The fact you can’t admit that is sad. Gl in life fr
You don’t know how to think do you? Bittorrent is a hub created and maintained by someone. Just like lemmy has mods. Please really think before speak.
No, it’s a peer-to-peer protocol that does not depend on a “hub” or central server. Like, very famously. Trackers exist to facilitate peer discovery, but the protocol allows clients to discover each other through DHT, “distributed lookup network,” with no central server. Maybe you’re too young to remember gnutella but BitTorrent was created to be invulnerable to disruption by doing away with all central servers. Fucking ask an AI before you start insulting people’s intelligence, you don’t know what you’re talking about.
What about tor? What about i2p? What about gnutella? What about mojonation? What about the federation of Lemmy servers, who is in charge of that? What about FreeNet? What about Bitcoin? What about Ethereum? Bro, do you even code???
Finding your thesis convincing requires you to be utterly ignorant of the world you are living in, blinded by your own baggage and bullshit and too cowardly to be curious.
I don’t need to code, who is the authority that codes that hub? Who updates it maintains it please use your brain
Do you actually want to learn or are you just trying to be a shitty little debate boy?
Nah you’re just not very smart, no authority to manage very thing is actually copium.
“No authority to manage very thing is actually copium”
Lol 📸
This troglodyte needs hierarchy to feel ok and can’t imagine functioning without it. Not everyone can imagine a future they’ve never experienced. Many people were never taught critical thought and logic and your neural centers atrophy with disuse. It’s not their fault and we need to figure out how to deal with them before revolution and then care for them after.
That’s the problem with the ignorant and critically stupid; they think they know things they have no reasonable way of knowing. Case in point…
Go put a sticker on your car, little buddy.
Nah your the type of moron that doesn’t like science
You might want to read up on what Anarchism actually is, since you seem to be pretty unaware: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism.
edit: lol did big brain autocrat make sock puppets