• terranoid@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’s a philosophical question they have no real answer to and why they probably shouldn’t fucking do this

      • HarneyToker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Thoughts are composed of a large number of neurons, similar to a computer composted of many circuits. There actually is a real answer to the question.

        Should add I’m not trying to be confrontational as you clearly are passionate about this. Just trying to keep it fact based.

        • terranoid@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 minutes ago

          A single perceptron is proven to be able to solve a simple mathematical problem, so I don’t think you can hand wave this away by assuming a thought has to have more neurons to be complex enough to be considered a “thought”. That isn’t a scientific fact or answer to the problem.