IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to Comics@lemmy.mlEnglish · 30 天前WikiPedia:Neutral Point of Viewlemmy.mlimagemessage-square89linkfedilinkarrow-up1155arrow-down147
arrow-up1108arrow-down1imageWikiPedia:Neutral Point of Viewlemmy.mlIndustryStandard@lemmy.world to Comics@lemmy.mlEnglish · 30 天前message-square89linkfedilink
minus-squareBrilliantantTurd4361@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down4·30 天前Removed by mod
minus-squaresad_detective_man@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up30arrow-down6·edit-229 天前 (Your post got removed but mine didn’t. Somehow the hivemind missed that I was agreeing with you)
minus-squarem532@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down4·29 天前The dog can easily be interpreted as wikipedia, preventing edits. You scored an own goal.
minus-squareFeathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down6·28 天前It doesn’t count as an own goal if you have to use a fringe interpretation to reverse the meaning lol
minus-squaresad_detective_man@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·28 天前No, in this place that’s totally valid. This is like the discourse equivalent of Appalachia inbred bloodlines
minus-squareRiverRock@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·27 天前“Everyone capable of debunking my half-baked ideas about the world is an inhuman machine so I don’t need to think about what they say.”
minus-squareEugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·26 天前It’s funny how calling them out gets removed/banned but they aren’t a echo chamber hivemind.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down4·30 天前You sure can. Your changes will immediately be reverted, you’ll be banned, and, in my case, you’ll be doxed, but you can do it.
minus-squaregoferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down4·30 天前 in my case, you’ll be doxed, but you can do it. Wtf Wikipedia editors
minus-squarepinto@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down11·29 天前I’m sure they have proof that happened. I’m sure of it.
minus-squareFleetwoodLinux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·29 天前Oh yes they should 100% totally point us to where they got doxxed that makes so much sense, it definitely wouldn’t lead to more problems for them
minus-squarepinto@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down10·29 天前 in my case, you’ll be doxed, but you can do it. That happened.
Removed by mod
(Your post got removed but mine didn’t. Somehow the hivemind missed that I was agreeing with you)
The dog can easily be interpreted as wikipedia, preventing edits.
You scored an own goal.
It doesn’t count as an own goal if you have to use a fringe interpretation to reverse the meaning lol
No, in this place that’s totally valid. This is like the discourse equivalent of Appalachia inbred bloodlines
🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Removed by mod
“Everyone capable of debunking my half-baked ideas about the world is an inhuman machine so I don’t need to think about what they say.”
It’s funny how calling them out gets removed/banned but they aren’t a echo chamber hivemind.
You sure can. Your changes will immediately be reverted, you’ll be banned, and, in my case, you’ll be doxed, but you can do it.
Wtf Wikipedia editors
I’m sure they have proof that happened. I’m sure of it.
Oh yes they should 100% totally point us to where they got doxxed that makes so much sense, it definitely wouldn’t lead to more problems for them
That happened.
It did, yes.