jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agoDoes “and” really mean “and”? Not always, the Supreme Court rules.www.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square8linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkDoes “and” really mean “and”? Not always, the Supreme Court rules.www.motherjones.comjeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square8linkfedilink
minus-squareCarlcarla@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoWouldn’t (3) E = (!A) and B and C also be a valid Interpretation?
Wouldn’t
(3) E = (!A) and B and C
also be a valid Interpretation?