As is “bringing justice” and “holding the highest of integrity” which leaves us in a great spot.

Wow picking random words that serve my adjenda is fun.

Well by all means attack the person over the argument.

Imagine researching a random stranger on the internet looking for a gotcha.

And the left has the American Constitution Society, big whoop; the right and the left aren’t doing anything that the otherside isn’t doing as well.

Bro, left dominates higher education. The idea that there’s some conservative cabal brainwashing law students is hilarious.

And the left didn’t do the exact same thing for their judges? Y’all are all just incorruptible while the right are spawn of Satan or something?..

ridiculous

Matter of perspective.

Judges are appointed for life; there’s really no reason why they would match lock step with Trumps orders. Yes they’re conservative (not all of them), but I don’t believe they’re going to break the law or compromise their integrity for Trump.

Qualified immunity can be stripped. It’s not absolute. Constitutional violations are absolutely grounds for losing qualified immunity.

Oh well go, go win the midterms.

You can sue the individual.

Sounds like an excellent opportunity to sue them into the ground. A federal officer illegal disregarding your constitutional rights is a payday most can only dream of.

So chill out and lawyer up.

But then who would lie to the share holders about “fun” and “exciting” new games that the kids are going to love.

Joe Biden deported 35% of detainees for no reason? What an absolute piece of garbage.

It just needs time to find its tone and audience.

I agree with what you said but I’m kind of confused about this… Like the audience is there, its been there for 30 years. Why would you want to find a new one.

But there aren’t any equal amount of overseas bots pushing the other direction?

Well I find it concerning because I really would love a new Star Trek that’s on the level of TNG, or Voyager, or DS9.

Ultimately does it effect me? Nope, but it’s disappointing when producers feel that such a departure is a good thing or even necessary to stay relevant with the times; when in reality those changes make the entire show irrelevant.

You’re saying that any rejoinder offered to any criticism that might have been levied to by a right winger is de facto an accusation of review bombing and an assertion of the show’s popularity in spite of such?

No. I’m not saying that.

The video OP posted was talking about specific nonsense positions put forward by specific nonsense people.

Which might not be stated but I feel is a defensive response to the negative reviews.

Is this video about MAGA response?

Are the negative reviews most likely from MAGA style viewers?

Yes? Then the two are absolutely connected.

You seem very concerned with how popular this show is.

I’ve answered this multiple times. Low viewship and high review bombs clearly indicate a disconnect between production and what’s expected by the audience. Sure they can produce whatever they want, but if Ford Motors starts producing coffee, then don’t be surprised when their customer base says “WTF, we don’t want this, we never asked for this”.

Viagra will kill the shit out of you if you have a heart attack and the emergency room gives you nitroglycerin.

Well. Maybe you don’t die, but it won’t have the intended effect.

why hide behind numbers at all?

Oh, okay let’s keep spending millions per episode so a few thousand people can enjoy the show. That’s absolutely how show business works.

Numbers are critical and a key indicator of mainstream success.

As I’ve stated multiple times already low viewer count combined with high review bombs indicates a disconnect between what’s being produced and what the audience wants.