

Itakes perfect sense really. They want to be able to legally execute their political enemies and anyone ideologically opposed to them.


Itakes perfect sense really. They want to be able to legally execute their political enemies and anyone ideologically opposed to them.


Blood eagles were only mentioned by Christian skalds hundreds of years after the viking age. There is zero contemporary historical evidence that vikings ever practiced that form of execution.
Social media isn’t the entirety of the internet. Banning them from social media doesn’t preclude other forms of digital communication.


I don’t know anything about sponsor agreements. Just because the sponsors don’t have direct access, that doesn’t mean there aren’t other ways for them to get that information.


Big tech is the problem. Indie tech is still cool as shit.


Sounds like a you problem. You fucked up so everyone needs constant surveillance? Fuck that authoritarian nonsense and fuck you for supporting it.
How the fuck is banning kids from social media taking away their access to communication with their friends? That’s a non-sequiter.


Their chips kinda suck ass though


YouTube knows exactly where you start and stop the video, what segments you skip, etc., etc. and the channel has access to those analytics. Not saying that anyone shares that with the sponsors, but the mechanism IS in place.
Sorry, wtf has RFK Jr. won?


That Mitchell and Webb Look! Hilarious British sketch comedy show, and if you enjoy it, check out Peep Show by the same comedians, David Mitchell and Robert Webb. Even funnier IMO!
For the record, I fully do not believe that RFK Jr. is remotely self-aware, nor is Trump for that matter. There absolutely are self-aware individuals in the administration who are as you describe, no doubt, but I do not believe those two are among them.


Thank you, perfectly legible now. 😊


Impossibly difficult is an oxymoron. If something is impossible, it can’t be difficult because if it is difficult that means its very hard to achieve but still possible. If something is impossible, that means you cannot do it, full stop. It is not possible. Those are two completely different things.


I asked one question and you all are dogpiling me when you could have just scrolled right past. Now you can fuck right off. Its not unreasonable that somebody can’t play a goddamn video.


Can you rephrase that? I’m not sure what “you nice it is used well enough” is supposed to mean.


Why should anyone take your hypocritical message seriously? Calling out hypocrisy is idiocy? That makes zero fucking sense.


Is there a transcript? I’m not watching a video. This is a discussion board. Why are you being hostile to questions?
So you want kids to be talking to strangers online? Bruh.