No, I’m not. Regardless, my point is that that list is making requirements on some men to be what they don’t want to be, to not be considered the enemy of the new left. Sure, some men would love to be allowed to wear pink, but some of us would hate to have to wear it. When you present the pink-wearing, baking, doll playing man as the one you welcome on your political “side”, you’re telling every man who doesn’t conform to that, that they’re not welcome. So they join the right, despite it being full of nazis. We don’t want to join the nazi side, but unlike you they don’t hate us for who we are.
JustSomePerson
- 0 Posts
- 25 Comments
Yeah, fuck men who want to wear blue and play with cars. Being a man isn’t allowed. Unless you accept feminization, you’re the enemy. No wonder men choose to vote for the bad guys, when the “good” side demand that they play a role as weak.
This thread proves the opposite.
Have you considered not being a hateful piece of shit. People like you are why the blue graphs have the direction they have. You would do well to consider whether declaring half the population as evil for no other reason than their gender, can ever lead to a successful result.
Fuck them for calling the left liberal. Liberals are the people who sell schools, hospitals, and social services to the lowest bidding private enterprise. A solidly right wing ideology that puts profit over people.
JustSomePerson@kbin.socialto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Seems like world deleted the Threads discussion post1713·2 years agoI for one, spent time blocking what I wanted to, to curate my feed, and it took time.
If that is your general approach, why are you suddenly so eager to hand over that responsibility to the instance owner? Why are you pushing for that instances should curate the feeds of all their users, rather than the users themselves?
JustSomePerson@kbin.socialto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's an aspect of your job that college didn't prepare you for?2·2 years agoIf you were to study version control in a comp sci degree, you would study the way it’s implemented, not how to use it. The data models for how to store and access repositories of many files with many changes is interesting, and can have different aspects depending on if it is text content or binary. Is it optimal to store each file as an aggregate of its diffs, no matter how many. Should there be snapshot points, etc?
Those are the aspects of version control that belong in tertiary level computer science. Learning how to use “git add” and “git push” don’t.
JustSomePerson@kbin.socialto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's an aspect of your job that college didn't prepare you for?53·2 years agoIt doesn’t require university level study to understand. You took Comp Sci, not applied software development. If you can pass Comp Sci, you should be able to use a system like git without it having been part of a tertiary level curriculum.
I am not incredibly smart, but I am smart enough to be aware of my own shortcomings. And those confirm this. I do often find myself supporting irrational positions because I don’t want things to go the way that lots of awful people want it to. My desire for their cause to fail is stronger than my rational ability to analyze what would actually be best. That’s how the human mind works.
deleted by creator
JustSomePerson@kbin.socialto A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world•HBO Max "thanks" me for being a loyal subscriber, by removing features from my plan without reducing the cost.250·2 years agoWell, you are here, participating in a discussion about Max subscriptions. It does seem like you do care.
JustSomePerson@kbin.socialto A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world•HBO Max "thanks" me for being a loyal subscriber, by removing features from my plan without reducing the cost.378·2 years agoAnd then you’re going to whine and cry when they cancel your favourite shows?
JustSomePerson@kbin.socialto World News@lemmy.ml•Indigenous Voice: Australians reject historic Indigenous referendum - BBC News1·2 years agoEnshrining racial differences in the constitution is absolutely disgusting, no matter how good your intentions are.
JustSomePerson@kbin.socialto World News@lemmy.ml•Indigenous Voice: Australians reject historic Indigenous referendum - BBC News11·2 years agoNobody is proving an endorsement of monarchy. You’re using monarchy as an argument for adding (additional) racism to the constitution. It’s a fucking stupid argument. “One thing is bad, therefore it is not a problem to make other things worse too.”
If something has a flaw (monarchy) that’s not a reason to make it worse (enshrine racially based representation).
JustSomePerson@kbin.socialto World News@lemmy.ml•Indigenous Voice: Australians reject historic Indigenous referendum - BBC News1·2 years agodeleted by creator
JustSomePerson@kbin.socialto World News@lemmy.ml•Indigenous Voice: Australians reject historic Indigenous referendum - BBC News1·2 years agodeleted by creator
JustSomePerson@kbin.socialto World News@lemmy.ml•Indigenous Voice: Australians reject historic Indigenous referendum - BBC News21·2 years agoIt is fucking disgusting to see your defense of racism.
ALL HUMANS HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE TREATED EQUALLY IN THE EYES OF THE LAW!
JustSomePerson@kbin.socialto World News@lemmy.ml•Indigenous Voice: Australians reject historic Indigenous referendum - BBC News11·2 years agoEverybody should have the same right to be heard. Different people having different rights to be heard, based on their race, is absolutely objectionable. And racist.
I’m a white man. The kind of people who are represented by the downward arrows. My point is that the arrows are going that way because of attitudes like those in the comment above. We used to vote for the socialist parties when it was the working class against the capital. Now it’s white men who are declared the enemy by those parties, because of gender and skin, aspects which are impossible to change.