• 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 27th, 2023

help-circle

  • I’m not sure how familiar you are with computers in general, but I think the best way to explain Docker is to explain the problem it’s looking to solve. I’ll try and keep it simple.

    Imagine you have a computer program. It could be any program; the details aren’t important. What is important, though, is that the program runs perfectly fine on your computer, but constantly errors or crashes on your friend’s computer.

    Reproducibility is really important in computing, especially if you’re the one actually programming the software. You have to be certain that your software is stable enough for other people to run without issues.

    Docker helps massively simplify this dilemma by running the program inside a ‘container’, which is basically a way to run the same exact program, with the same exact operating system and ‘system components’ installed (if you’re more tech savvy, this would be packages, libraries, dependencies, etc.), so that your program will be able to run on (best-case scenario) as many different computers as possible. You wouldn’t have to worry about if your friend forgot to install some specific system component to get the program running, because Docker handles it for you. There is nuance here of course, like CPU architecture, but for the most part, Docker solves this ‘reproducibility’ problem.

    Docker is also nice when it comes to simply compiling the software in addition to running it. You might have a program that requires 30 different steps to compile, and messing up even one step means that the program won’t compile. And then you’d run into the same exact problem where it compiles on your machine, but not your friend’s. Docker can also help solve this problem. Not only can it dumb down a 30-step process into 1 or 2 commands for your friend to run, but it makes compiling the code much less prone to failure. This is usually what the Dockerfile accomplishes, if you ever happen to see those out in the wild in all sorts of software.

    Also, since Docker puts things in ‘containers’, it also limits what resources that program can access on your machine (but this can be very useful). You can set it so that all the files it creates are saved inside the container and don’t affect your ‘host’ computer. Or maybe you only want to give permission to a few very specific files. Maybe you want to do something like share your computer’s timezone with a Docker container, or prevent your Docker containers from being directly exposed to the internet.

    There’s plenty of other things that make Docker useful, but I’d say those are the most important ones–reproducibility, ease of setup, containerization, and configurable permissions.

    One last thing–Docker is comparable to something like a virtual machine, but the reason why you’d want to use Docker over a virtual machine is much less resource overhead. A VM might require you to allocate gigabytes of memory, multiple CPU cores, even a GPU, but Docker is designed to be much more lightweight in comparison.


  • You say you’ve already read Librewolf’s FAQ, so I can skip over what they’ve provided in their response.

    The only possible downside I could see would be that your encrypted data is stored on Mozilla servers. Which isn’t a very major downside–it’s properly end-to-end-encrypted. This is mentioned both by Mozilla themselves, as well as in the Librewolf docs. This is the only downside I can see right now, but for the paranoid, it might be worth looking toward the future; who knows, maybe some day, Firefox will randomly decide to disable E2EE for Firefox sync. That could be a potential downside down the road. But I find that to be pretty unrealistic… I honestly can’t see a lot of ways for Mozilla to screw this up.

    If the prospect of relying on Mozilla servers still makes you uncomfortable, then you can self-host a sync server, but it’s not exactly a quick setup. They do provide a Docker method of installation, at least. The sync server code is found here, along with installation instructions for self-hosting and how to connect it to Firefox/Librewolf/other derivatives: https://github.com/mozilla-services/syncstorage-rs



  • I get 8.44 bits (1 in 347.34 browsers). I use Firefox with Arkenfox user.js applied on top, with some of my own custom overrides.

    However, I think the biggest factor could be because I have Ublock Origin set to medium-hard mode (block 1st party scripts, 3rd party scripts and 3rd party iframes by default on all websites), so the lack of JavaScript heavily affects what non-whitelisted websites can track. I did whitelist 1st-party scripts on the main domain for this test (coveryourtracks.eff.org), but all the ‘tracker’ site redirects stay off the whitelist.

    I actually had to allow Ublock Origin to temporarily visit the tracker sites for the test to properly finish–otherwise it gives me a big warning that I’m about to visit a domain on the filter list.







  • I assume 4chan does not sell your data with 3rd parties (it pays the bills from user donations and people who buy a ‘4chan pass’, I think advertisers might’ve pulled out from the site long ago, given its vulgar nature) however it does appear to comply with law enforcement. See this 4chan user who was sending death threats to a Florida sheriff on 4chan, and was later arrested for this: https://www.thedailybeast.com/tyler-meyer-busted-for-threatening-sheriff-mike-chitwood-on-4chan

    I believe it’s possible that 4chan had given this user’s IP address to law enforcement. 4chan records your IP address when you post, and only administrators can see it: https://4chan.org/faq#postanon

    You can also look at the Wikipedia entry for 4chan, similar users have been arrested for making these death threats: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4chan

    I don’t advocate for what these users do, it’s harmful, and they honestly have it coming when they get arrested–but it shows that if 4chan is compelled to reveal your information, they will.

    It’s not possible to post under a VPN by default, they’re blocked site-wide to combat spam and automated posts, even though there’s already a captcha when you post? I guess they’re just trying to play it extra safe. You can post under a VPN if you buy the 4chan pass (https://www.4chan.org/pass), however 4chan does not support any privacy-centric options like Monero or even cold hard physical cash, which means even if you post under a VPN, you can still be linked to your posts via payment method.

    Me personally? I lurk on there every once in a while, but I’ve never posted, for these reasons. At least I can post under a VPN on Lemmy.