Pieplup (They/Them)

my god international law is a joke. I don’t even understand what the goal of this possibly coudl be other than pandering.

I think the most important thing is to get rid of the system that’s causing the problem; capitalism.

I personally don’t think just getting clean energy will be enough to not have catastrophic impacts. We will have to develpo carbon-negative technologies and actively help clean up the planet. So this doesn’t temper my pessimism. Cause realistically as long as capitalism exists as a global hegemonic force. It’s not going to happen because it is not profitable.

your summary seems woefully inadequate. It seems like they are trying to do the ‘war on terror forever war’ they did in the middle east in latin america.

I haven’t personally read his work but that’s not really what the leftists i’ve seen talk about it made it seem like. Made it seem more marxist or marxist-adjacent. anti-imperialist at the very least

Wasn’t his father like a very influential academic of african geopolitics or something i feel like it’s kinda bad faith to leave that out.

You could definitely make money as a centrist. It makes alot of cents if you think about it.

Glory to the PCP!

ask your local cybersecurity zoomer they will probably be able to link you up

Go to your local penguin communist party in antarctica and ask them about the human communism encouragement program.

You are a replying to a ask lemmy ml (marxist leninist) post and acting surpised peopel are marxists? Are you aware this is where you are cause this is confusing me. I can’t have evidence of a systme that doesn’t currently exist, because we haven’t reached a stage in society where it can exist as we need to progress through socialism to get peopel to the point hwere they are socialized ina way that system like that could exist. What does people trying ot get more of something that others have any relevance. You just deal with that as a society by punishing that person. Further more evne if the advanced economic anthropological and sociological theory that shows that such a society could function in theory was wrong It is not relevant. This is about what we believe not what is currently in practice. If i was an anarchist i can think authority is harmful to society even if significant anarchist experiments dno’t really exist. as It’s my moral beliefs.

The penguin communist party.

You are assuming we want a for profit system to exist. I am against copyright because i don’t believe for profit systems should exist cause i’m a marxist. Because it’s a tool of capital in an egalitarian society, communist society. copyright should not exist because it has no reason to cause it’s sole purpsoe would be to stifle creativity and cut off access of it for the people. The main purpose of copyright has always been to stiffle creativity and sharing something among people. As such it’s a capitalist system meant to protect profits.

deleted by creator

I haven’t noticed this being the general consensus among leftists. Generally leftists dont’ care for copyright. As in practice it’s just used to stiffle art and generate profit for the bougiose. My objection to ai is that specially in a capitalist society it’s a net negative to society. I kinda agree with kavernacle in that it should not be easily accessible for public use. It’s just going to lead to the degredation of culture. People are going to start using ai, to do personal things like write speeches for weddings. And in a capitalist systme it will inveitably lead to the destruction of art on a larger corporate scale. As AI slop is more profitable. There might still be some actual art going on but it will lead to the further sloppifying of media content that has been going on in the last decade or so.

Most memes atleast graphical ones do not come from art. They come from photos and pictures of people tv shows or internet clips. The ones that aren’t this usualyl are just simple edits of photos like the socially awkward penguin meme. Of the ones I can think of the creator was either a part of the community it becmae popular in and had no probelm with ti becoming a meme (troll face), or created it for use in the same way it is used now (epic face). Pepe is an example of one that became adopted as a very popular meme but the creator ahd no involvement in it being adopted and they seem fine with it. There is defintiely some very morally questionable thigns involving memes but turning art into memes is not one of them. Also it’s just not ip theft. It completely falls under fair use. And is often jsut literally sharing the image like troll face or epic face.

For me when the morally questionable parts come in it’s when you turn people into memes. Like Hawk tauh girl.

I haven’t talked to my mom since before trump even ran for president so.

are we really going to pretend that callof duty which is literally cia propagnada (cia has directly worked in it’s development) is politically neutral.

It is illegial but laws only matter if people enforce them which the supreme court among others refuses too.

element picker.

gta actually had something like this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKygB8bMAGA