In Australia they’re now called ‘intentional communities’. That might help with searching. Some are religious but some are not. Quite a few are just science/sustainability based.
- 1 Post
- 24 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 17th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
This is needed here:
Man knows his fallacies! Excellent. This bodes well for interesting discussion!
I, too, am interested in having serious good faith discussions, and will not become shrill if you present nuanced views, or criticism of mine.
Me fast forwarding through the underwater stuff so I don’t have to hold my breath. Might get the books for the same reason.
Hence the job title ‘prompt engineer’ I guess. If you know about Soylent Green, AI is people!
No I like yours better.
What about semantics?
“Nothing is better than cake."
“But bread is better than nothing.
"Does that mean that bread is better than cake?”
There are certainly photoshop jobs of this image, but as far as I can tell, the black and white version with the sign saying ‘pon farr night fridays’ is the original. I’d like to know where the photo came from though.
…quotation marks… That’s enshittification at work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enshittification A backwards step from… Alta Vista in 1996!!! https://jkorpela.fi/altavista/
Damn. Just when I’d learned to pronounce Eyjafjallajökull.
Enshittification. Every human who uses computers on a daily basis needs to understand this word.
We donate to Wikipedia once per year.
One of my favourites is “Christ on a bike!” because it’s so hilarious.
Stopped going when they made shit coffee.
If plastic surgery is based on people with good looks, it seems to be very loosely based on them!
They don’t give a definition of ‘incomplete’ or ‘faulty’? Is that on purpose?
“has a model of how words relate to each other, but does not have a model of the objects to which the words refer.
It engages in predictive logic, but cannot perform syllogistic logic - reasoning to a logical conclusion from a set of propositions that are assumed to be true”
Is this true of all current LLMs?
Thank you for replying. This is the level of info I used to love on Reddit and now love on Lemmy.
@sh.itjust.works Yes it does, whether you want it to or not