They never cared for privacy, it was all marketing. We should be equally suspicious of Proton and Tutanota.
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
long_chicken_boat@sh.itjust.worksto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•UK Gvmt Say Mask Wearing At Protests Will Soon Be Illegal
3·2 years agoRegardless if the guy is pro-Russia or not, banning masks in protests is very much an authoritarian move.
Oh I answered the wiremin asshole a bunch of times and they deleted their posts when I told how wiremin was suspicious as hell and shouldn’t be trusted.
long_chicken_boat@sh.itjust.worksto
Technology@lemmy.world•Nvidia Blackwell RTX 5000 GPUs may debut earlier than expectedEnglish
0·2 years agoI’m sure they won’t be any cheaper. Nvidia can be as greedy as they want given the low competition they have.
long_chicken_boat@sh.itjust.worksto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Smart android keyboard respecting privacy?
23·2 years agoI’m guessing that it isn’t. So don’t use it.
long_chicken_boat@sh.itjust.worksto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Privacy Win: EU Parliament Decides That Your Private Messages Must Not Be Scanned!
5·2 years agothis does not affect Google, Meta or any other Big Tech at all. This law was trying to break encryption or do some sort of client side scanning. And it didn’t got approved.
This does not force Google or Meta to encrypt your chats if they weren’t doing so. Or to remove their own backdoors in the encryption if they had them. It’s just a law that was not passed. So your comment does not make any sense.
PS: it’s not like Google or Meta care too much about encrypting the contents. They’ll happily take your metadata which is super valuable. This is what Meta does with WhatsApp.
I’m in mastodon but I wouldn’t mind trying Bluesky when there are third party servers.