I think you a word there.
Orphie Baby
- 3 Posts
- 10 Comments
Orphie Baby@lemmy.worldto Games@lemmy.world•Sabotage Studio initially projected sales of 250,000 copies of Sea of Stars in the first year. They hit that target within just a week.English2·2 years agoI agree with you completely. I just wasn’t about to write an essay on potential contributing factors that can help one succeed, plus luck. I just wanted to say that these days, there are a lot of indie smash hits out there that succeed in part because people saw a whole lot of love in them, when a lot of the more cynical corporate creators would never have made such things in such ways. Hell, it’s not just indies. It’s why many Nintendo games are so beloved, even “forgotten” ones like Earthbound. ^^
Orphie Baby@lemmy.worldto Games@lemmy.world•Sabotage Studio initially projected sales of 250,000 copies of Sea of Stars in the first year. They hit that target within just a week.English151·2 years agoI know that stupid rich CEOs and shareholders don’t understand this, but… “heart”. You make a game with heart, and it’s immediately apparent to the audience. You can try to break down what it is that gives it away, but that’s unnecessary.
If a work of art has heart, it will probably sell well. As long as people can clearly see what it is, and as long as it doesn’t do anything alienating.
Orphie Baby@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Mozilla review of 25 car brands finds they're "a privacy nightmare"English0·2 years agoHow is that fucking legal?
Orphie Baby@lemmy.worldto You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK if you've seen something traumatic, playing Tetris for a couple of hours afterwards can drastically reduce the chance of it becoming a deeprooted memory and causing PTSDEnglish2·2 years agoThat is not what “the Tetris Effect” means. :P
Orphie Baby@lemmy.worldto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Why all of a sudden tech companies are not being favorable to their users?English1·2 years agoCapitalism: “Numbers go brrrrr”
Orphie Baby@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•James Cameron on AI: "I warned you guys in 1984 and you didn't listen"English1·2 years agoIt’s getting old telling people this, but… the AI that we have right now? Isn’t even really AI. It’s certainly not anything like in the movies. It’s just pattern-recognition algorithms. It doesn’t know or understand anything and it has no context. It can’t tell the difference between a truth and a lie, and it doesn’t know what a finger is. It just paints amalgamations of things it’s already seen, or throws together things that seem common to it— with no filter nor sense of “that can’t be correct”.
I’m not saying there’s nothing to be afraid of concerning today’s “AI”, but it’s not comparable to movie/book AI.
Edit: The replies annoy me. It’s just the same thing all over again— everything I said seems to have went right over most peoples’ heads. If you don’t know what today’s “AI” is, then please stop assuming about what it is. Your imagination is way more interesting than what we actually have right now. This is why we should have never called what we have now “AI” in the first place— same reason we should never have called things “black holes”. You take a misnomer and your imagination goes wild, and none of it is factual.
Orphie Baby@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•If you value privacy, ditch Chrome and switch to Firefox nowEnglish1·2 years ago10 to 15 years ago, myself. Don’t remember exactly.
Don’t forget your dual-wheel, 4D+ mouse!
!fuckcars@lemmy.world