Woa bro I was saying hard on but this is a full on raging erection maybe you should deal with your frustrations

Absolutely, and it’s by design by candid admission of environmentalist organizations and green parties. Their objective was over regulating the industry beyond any rationality and they succeeded.

Lemy has such a hard on against nuclear. I’m seeing reports by antinuclear think tank grifters shoved in my face almost daily…

Username checks out

Yes, this is literally what happens. If you’re too stupid to see that it’s not my problem lol

Keep telling that to yourself until they kill the nex…oh nvm it already happened 🤡

Lol nice scouring job 😂 now go ahead and tell me with a straight face it’s the same frequency and severity with pitbulls

I’m sure plenty of golden retrievers don’t have responsible owners, yet I don’t really hear of children mauled by them on the regular.

You guys are as unbearable as door to door evangelists

This BULLSHIT comes up every so often, and I’m kinda tired so I’ll to someone else to try and explain how the electricity grid actually works.

Citing a comment I’ve recently seen, it’s amazing how humanity managed to produce only one generation actually competent with computers.

Also, there is a sense of incredibly naive detachment here. It’s not like the oil refinery is working because all people involved have the only ultimate goal of killing the planet because of some evil plan. The oil refinery is working for you, to produce the gasoline you pump in your car and the plastics you buy stuff in every single day. We need to reduce demand for that stuff, through individual action too. If you use oil industry’s stuff, “their emissions” are YOUR emissions.

Yeah because they do fracking to simply burn fossil fuels because they’re bad bad evil ppl. Not because there’s like, a huge demand for them.

Sure LMAO

I don’t think you understand the concept of exponential, or radioactivity for that matter tbh. The statement is completely truthful.

The harm of ionizing radiation is given by the activity of the source. Which decays exponentially. You should not go on the internet lecturing people you don’t know about things you don’t understand.

Also, you moved the goalpost: first you claimed waste “doesn’t decay exponentially” and then without acknowledging it, you now claim that “exponential decay is not the same as losing harm exponentially”

Sorry what? That link literally explains the exponential decay of radioisotopes.

The sustainable approach at this point would be eco-dictatorship, not sure if it’s so easily achievable

Rate of decay for a specific isotope is constant, so its abundance decays exponentially. Of course a species can transmute in a new radionuclide so the process in total will not be exactly exponential, but pretty close. Seen on a log scale it’s awfully close to a straight line

Funny how everyone is immediately concerned with a few thousands of cubic meters of solid waste that literally loses its harm exponentially quickly and we can store underground while all the billions of tons of toxic liquid and gaseous waste coming from a sleuth of industrial applications (including renewables production) constantly being pumped in the biosphere never get a mention