antitrust legislation exists and applies to proprietary software

Personally, I don’t use IrfanView for editing because there are far better alternatives (Rawtherapee, Krita, Gimp if must be) but it is great for browsing photos because it is so fast and versatile.

Scanning is pretty neat too.

pretty sure even smartphones can use USB audio interfaces these days with an OTG adapter

Most (all?) mainline Civilizations should be able to scratch that itch

Also, maybe don’t make “show the rest of the world that we hate Trump” the primary goal of your resistance movement. Ugh.

I assume the term “bitch” got blocked because in one context, it is a sexist insult.

The thing is, it wasn’t used in that context here.

So to me, this is at least spiritually adjacent to the Scunthorpe problem.

i’m just glad we are being extremely normal about women’s bodies in this thread and not fetishizing complete strangers in public

As a trans woman, I agree! Being beholden to the whims of employers sucks for everybody, and everybody deserves a solution.

But also, give me $1000 right now so i can feed my crippling addiction to tailoring gadgets.

Everybody can run a Lemmy server. That includes people who do not know the Scunthorpe problem.

I can say “bitch” just fine btw

You could, but you’d have to know that some people do this, and it is confusing to maintainers if empty issues keep popping up.

Bug reports are contributions from people who try to help your project. I don’t go to Github issues to complain - i can do that on socials. I do it as a service for the devs, to make them aware of an issue they may not yet be aware of.

Treating issue reporters like this is just disrespectful of the work they are trying to contribute.

Note that this message only appears AFTER someone has already gone through the work of writing an error report. At that point, just throwing their work into the toilet SUCKS.

I know, right?

The window seat is the singer from Limp Bizkit, who I am told is actually a pretty pleasant person IRL

The article cited by The Register cites this more detailed analysis in turn: https://blog.katanaquant.com/p/your-llm-doesnt-write-correct-code

Performance of the AI-generated version was 20,000 times slower on one specific benchmark, but “only” about 2,000 times slower when averaging over multiple different benchmarks (which is, imo, a better measurement of the code’s quality).

So I suppose The Register pulled from multiple sources (as you should) and just linked to the most top-level of all of them.