• No need to be, but this is a bad example because if the company can prove you were wreckless intentionally, they have an easy court case and someone now liable for all damages

            • … Never worked for for a company that did training in such a way. The training is mandatory because they are usually required to show these items for their insurances. Usually you have weeks if not months notice and have to renew it annually or some dumb crap. They are also usually done on their training websites. 3 companies I have worked for just deactivate your AD account if you don’t get it done in a timely manner. Companies who can lose millions or lose actual information that will hurt other companies and get sued do not mess around with their responsibility on such.

              Mom and pop shop… it wouldn’t matter much in the first place. Restore the data, reset passwords and call it a day. Medical, military, or such… No fun.

            • ɔiƚoxɘup
              link
              fedilink
              -2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Negligence of that order would surely be prosecuted.

              Edit: a claim of duress would probably work though.

              • @maynarkh@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                91 year ago

                I can’t really imagine it working. Maybe resulting in a firing with cause at max.

                Also, what would the company win by suing? The employee is most likely broke, and anything recouped is offset by the negative PR.

        • pewter
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Oddly, “wreckless” might mean the exact opposite.