• @refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      She has her hand in too many strategic places, unlike Telegram.

      employed at Google for 13 years

      speaker at the 2018 World Summit

      written for the American Civil Liberties Union

      advised the White House, the FCC, the FTC, the City of New York, the European Parliament, and many other governments and civil society organizations

    • @mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      Not that the action against Telegram is right, but there’s a big difference between what Signal and Telegram is doing.

      • Otter
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        Would you have more info on the differences? I was wondering the same thing, but I don’t know enough about Telegram to compare

        • I’m no authority on it but from what I’ve read it seems to have more to do with the social features of telegram where lots of content is being shared, both legal and illegal. Signal doesn’t have channels that support hundreds of thousands of people at once, nor media hosting to match.

          • socsa
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Right, the French authorities are going to present evidence that this dude was aware of specific illegal activity and refuse to comply with a legal warrant involving said actively, making him guilty of obstruction at best, and possibly conspiracy. Signal complies with warrants, they just don’t have anyone’s keys. Telegram has everyone’s keys, and theoretically could turn them over but they refuse. That’s a huge difference from a legal perspective.

            • Thank you. I’m going to restate your explanation to be sure I’ve got it:

              • authorities want platforms to comply with legal requests
              • when Signal gets a subpoena, they open the key locker and show that it’s empty. They provide the metadata they can (sign up date and last seen date, full stop) and tell authorities they can’t do better.
              • when Telegram gets a subpoena, they open the key locker and show all the keys, then slam it shut in the face of the investigator, telling them to get bent.
              • conclusion: it’s easier to never have the keys in the first place than to tease the government with them
        • @pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Signal always responds to authorities when they ask for data, and they give them all they have: the day they registered, their phone number and the timestamp they last used the app.

          Telegram has unencrypted channels of drug dealing, and what I heard is a lot of illegal porn too. The authorities want information on certain users there and Telegram doesn’t comply. This is directly against the law Signal is not breaking, because they always send all the data they have to the law enforcement.

          • sunzu2
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            while not wrong context matters, US social media companies also enable human, weapons, and drug trafficking. they play a role in a few genocides too.

            but the western regime does not care.

            • @pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              But they give their data when the officials ask. That is all that matters. And I seriously hope none of us uses Telegram or WhatsApp to any discussions. Use Signal because that is so far pretty unbreakable.

              Telegram is already in the hands of that tiny Russian old man and WhatsApp is owned by a lizard.

          • @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -210 months ago

            Telegram is a propaganda weapon in some sense, between two worldviews - one is “a good service doesn’t require trust, because they physically can’t sell you”, another is “a good service you can trust because they won’t sell you”. And Telegram helps the latter.

            So frankly - kill it with fire. Sadly I’m in Russia and everybody uses it here.

        • @gedaliyah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          110 months ago

          The folks at F-Droid have said that Signal would certainly qualify, but Signal doesn’t want multiple channels out there. F-Droid is just honoring their wishes.

        • @toasteecup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          Are you developing your opinions based on vibes or have you actually audited their software yourself (you are free to do so both client and federation server code)?

          If you audited it, have you produced an actual report with metrics and points of reference for your data points?

          • southsamurai
            link
            fedilink
            010 months ago

            This person has been running around spreading FUD in every post about this

              • @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                010 months ago

                It’s actually sad, even though I’m a libertarian, tankies and in general marxists could have made a good input into our future. But if they can believe in Telegram being secure because of vibes and not even doing basic research, they’ve already lost.

                • @toasteecup@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  110 months ago

                  Heeey I am also a libertarian, I just tend towards left libertarian. Back to the point of discussion, I find it difficult to ha e a meaningful conversation with the tankies or in general anyone from lemmy.ml . The discussions tend to lack any real data and feel entirely vibe based OR it’s apologist bullshit for Russia.

                  Like it’s cool if you like communism and have a philosophy based around why you think it’ll help humanity. I can politely disagree but still listen and discuss. It’s quite another to just be a complete dipshit and say “Ukraine had the invasion coming” (actual quote I’ve seen).

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
      link
      fedilink
      010 months ago

      The very fact that there have never been any attempts in the west to stop Signal from operating says volumes in my opinion.

    • @TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      They won’t there’s no need. Their clients are garbage and they’re most likely backdoored anyways. This action against Telegram is only happening because they can’t get inside it, they can’t backdoor it nor corrupt anyone. If they were able to do that they wouldn’t be doing this.

      • @ArchAengelus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        No matter how good the protocol or client encryption, your privacy is only as good as your own physical security for the device in question.

        Given that if you lose your private key, there is no recovery, I would be surprised if there were real back doors in the clients. Maybe unintentional ways to leak data, but you can go look for yourself: https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android

        They have one for each client.

        • @TCB13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          If you don’t turn on the secret chat feature it wont be, yes. However if E2EE was the only deciding factor for a gov to go against an App then they woudln’t be going after Telegram. The fact that govts are going so hard at telegram simply proves that even when the company has access to all our chats they don’t actually provide them to said govts.

          I’m not saying telegram is good from a security perspective, I’m just saying that event without E2EE and all the modern wonders govts can’t still get in because the company doesn’t indulge their requests.