db0M to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com • 1 month agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up192arrow-down166
arrow-up126arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0M to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com • 1 month agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-square@naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilink27•1 month agoEh if I’m not gonna do what the gov tells me I’m not gonna listen to a random internet comment repeating dogma ;)
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)linkfedilink10•1 month agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilink-1•1 month ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilink-2•edit-21 month agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
minus-square@fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish7•1 month agoI find this sentence very funny
Eh if I’m not gonna do what the gov tells me I’m not gonna listen to a random internet comment repeating dogma ;)
it’s a fact, not dogma
Accelerationism is a religion.
this isn’t about accelerationism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
you’re making that up
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
I find this sentence very funny