• buckykat [none/use name]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    422 days ago

    Yeah, the two big differences between the F9 and starship first stages are the sheer number of engines that have to run right all at once and the catch tower.

    The only previous rocket with that many engines was the N1 which famously struggled with getting them all to run together. SpaceX has a lot better computers available to them to handle that than the N1 designers did, and they have had first stage engine failures but they’ve managed to handle them without loss of vehicle.

    The catch tower allows for significant weight savings (not just the weight of the legs themselves but also the internal structure to allow the rocket to be supported from the bottom with the tanks empty) and faster reuse than legs allow at the cost of needing to get your landing targeting extremely precise, which SpaceX has gotten a lot of practice with from the Falcon. The general availability of very fast computers helps here a lot too.

    A lot of the Chinese companies developing reusable rockets are planning on catch towers too.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          322 days ago

          Same, China has been very consistent at hitting targets with the space program so far. I’m really excited to see an actual base on the moon built.

          • buckykat [none/use name]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            322 days ago

            The ILRS is so cool, I’m really looking forward to the ISRU experiment on the 嫦娥八号Cháng’é-8 mission.