• Mousy [she/her, they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3514 days ago

    Can’t imagine sweden will have the spine to do anything even though the crewmates were taken hostage on what i imagine is a vessal attributed to them in international waters. The fact that israel takes these actions is because they know western countries will give them impunity.

    • edge [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3414 days ago

      Looks like it’s UK flagged. Still, one of its citizens was kidnapped in an international act of piracy.

      France had one of its politicians kidnapped, I doubt it’s going to to do anything either.

      • Mousy [she/her, they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2014 days ago

        Still, one of its citizens was kidnapped in an international act of piracy.

        If it’s an act of piracy then does that change possible jurisdiction? I skimmed through some articles and it seems like law around international waters is rather messy and ill-defined.

        • edge [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          From a quick search, it seems like international piracy has universal jurisdiction. So any country could prosecute I guess. I imagine countries have laws regarding piracy committed against vessels under their flag or committed against their citizens, but that’s per country so it depends on UK and/or Swedish law.

          But it also seems like the legal definition of piracy includes “private”, so maybe state actions don’t technically fall under piracy law (despite clearly being piracy)?