• queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    -75 days ago

    There’s different isotopes in the fallout, different radio spectrometry or whatever, but I think they could lie and say that the reason it looks like a conventional nuclear weapon is because Iran was hiding a nuke and they blew it up.

    • Logi
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      A nuclear detonation is a very delicate and precisely controlled process. It doesn’t just happen because a bomb goes off near the nuke. So sure, they can say anything, but there will be obvious evidence.

      Speaking of saying anything, I’m going to look for reliable confirmation that this even happened. I’m not taking Trump’s fucking tweet for it.

        • Logi
          link
          fedilink
          13 days ago

          What gives you the idea that I have any such idea? I find that quite puzzling.

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        What’s so fantastical about the US using a tactical nuke and then lying about it?

        Looks like that didn’t happen here, but I see no reason that it couldn’t.

        • @ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Because nuclear detonations are very different to conventional ones, and every major power has satellites monitoring for them. They can’t be hidden. Hell, any university or weather service within 3,000 miles would be able to detect it.

            • @pivot_root@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              Yes. Only in fantasy land. As Logi above said, nuclear detonation is an extremely precise, controlled process that has very specific conditions to achieve successfully. Even an actual fission bomb only manages to consume a fraction of the radioactive material.

              The only thing someone would achieve by denotating a conventional explosive near a reactor or nuclear stockpile is spreading highly radioactive dust around. That does not nor will ever look like uncontrolled nuclear fission, let alone a detonation from a thermonuclear warhead.

            • @ohulancutash@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              34 days ago

              Yes. Different blast pattern, different fallout pattern, different isotopes, different seismic signature, different sound wave pattern…

            • @pinkapple@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              24 days ago

              The US doesn’t have small enough nuclear penetrators to even try hiding something anyway, they can use tactical warheads as bunker busters but they can’t be meaningfully hidden. Meanwhile all these Iranian installations have been built with conventional bunker busters in mind so the existing American GBUs that must have been used may not have caused much real damage after all even if they double tapped the exact same spot.