fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agoWhen DinoCon is doing more than the US Govfiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square199linkfedilinkarrow-up11.87Karrow-down116file-text
arrow-up11.86Karrow-down1imageWhen DinoCon is doing more than the US Govfiles.catbox.moefossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square199linkfedilinkfile-text
https://nbcmontana.com/news/local/scientist-jack-horner-linked-to-jeffrey-epstein-in-newly-released-doj-files
minus-squarevillage604linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·edit-22 days agoThey answered. If you have evidence that you declined, then no. From the wording I’m willing to bet they did a bit more investigation than just doing a pass/fail on a Ctrl+f
minus-squarepresoak@lazysoci.allinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down17·2 days agoThey made a sweeping implied accusation two replies back, sans evidence, but now we want evidence. Go roll in your own feces. I have zero interest.
minus-squareNotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-22 days agoReal mad that you got booted from DinoCon, huh?
minus-squareKraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 days ago I have zero interest. Your constant stream of nonsensical replies says otherwise.
They answered. If you have evidence that you declined, then no.
From the wording I’m willing to bet they did a bit more investigation than just doing a pass/fail on a Ctrl+f
They made a sweeping implied accusation two replies back, sans evidence, but now we want evidence.
Go roll in your own feces. I have zero interest.
Who is “we”?
Real mad that you got booted from DinoCon, huh?
Your constant stream of nonsensical replies says otherwise.
Says the pedophile apologist, lol.