• taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    In 2016 it was a “Vote Against Trump Regardless Of Who It Is”. It’s shaping up to be that again, but this gives me hope that maybe we’ll have someone we can vote for that we like… Even if just a little. Harris is no Obama in charm, but it’s a step in the right direction.

    • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      The general election will continue to be a strategic vote against the party you don’t want to win until voters come out en masse in the primaries. And those better candidates will have to actually be running in the primaries.

        • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yes. I mean the thing that won’t happen until we overwhelmingly vote in the major parties primaries to put in representatives who will legislate those changes at the state level. Because 3rd party candidates aren’t winning with the current system, so we have to change the two major parties from within, through their primaries.

            • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              No 3rd party has won a single electoral vote since Wallace in '68. He won 46. You have to go to Teddy Roosevelt in 1912 to top that with 88 (the most ever). It’s either taking over the parties from the local level up through their primaries or it will take the full collapse of our government with a new constitutional convention, and that probably won’t go well.

                • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Well it can’t if we don’t try. For the 2024 primaries in Texas we had 17.9M registered voters, 3.2M primary ballots cast, and only 900k of them were Democratic. So I get why people think it isn’t going to work. But I think anyone expecting a “don’t vote and let it burn down” situation to result in an immediate improvement rather than things getting insanely worse are deluding themselves to everyone’s detriment.

                  • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    I’m definitely not in the don’t vote camp. I just think I have reasonable expectations of what my vote can accomplish, and it’s not much.

      • audiomodder@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        We actually saw this happen in 2020 in the Democratic Party. And establishment Democrats played the game to force Bernie out. We’re hearing from people that Biden wasn’t the best person to beat Trump, he was the best person to beat Bernie. That’s why they rallied around him and pulled the bullshit with Warren before Super Tuesday.

        • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yes, that was at the top. The president can’t unilaterally change state-owned voting laws. Bernie did succeed in getting more progressive candidates into the Democratic party primaries down ballot in 2018 and beyond. That pressure needs to be maintained all the way down to the state legislatures and city/county offices. We have to flip the states locally to get election reform at the state level in order to make 3rd party options viable at the national level. Focusing on the presidential race to shame Democrats into electoral reform is just an exercise in self-owning loss to the Republicans.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I could care less about charm. I wish more people would. Personally, I want a fucking autistic that defines real goals, outlines a plan to achieve them, and measures their success on how efficiently the goals are met. I’m exaggerating a bit, but I miss the days where politicians had platforms and were willing to be something more than just a feeling.

        • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          Bad bot. I like to leave a little wiggle room. I’ve often suprised myself and found that when I care very little about something, I can sometimes find a little more apathy later on.

    • Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      At this point, it’s all just about delaying the repression and concentration of power under a Trump presidency, as well as trying to slow down the climate catastrophe as much as possible on top of that. Things won’t get better any time soon, it’s simply not the historical situation and dynamic at the moment, but every year to organise people for radical alternatives for when the global collapse progresses further is valuable.