• brianary@lemmy.zipEnglish
          12·
          11 months ago

          If it’s not compelling enough for you to read it to support your position, why would I read it?

            • brianary@lemmy.zipEnglish
              12·
              11 months ago

              I can tell you’re really proud of these replies, but I’m afraid they don’t actually make sense.

              You were hoping to prove a logical implication (if P then Q), but you feel it was disproved since the premise didn’t happen. However, “not P” doesn’t actually prove anything about the implication.

              Anyway, no one is really accomplishing anything constructive here. Good luck!