db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 days agoLunch Room Discussionlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square55linkfedilinkarrow-up1994arrow-down111
arrow-up1983arrow-down1imageLunch Room Discussionlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 days agomessage-square55linkfedilink
minus-squarepeoplebeproblems@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·7 days agoMan that’s similar to my take on baseball. Tall, super-model-fit men swing wood at balls pitched by other men.
minus-squaredmention7@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up5·7 days agoStraight guy who enjoys baseball here – youre not wrong! At least baseball doesn’t need to have a squad of attractive women bouncing around in skirts on the sidelines to affirm the viewers’ sexuality.
minus-squaremasquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 days ago a squad of attractive women bouncing around in skirts on the sidelines I always thought they put them there because without them there’d literally be nothing about the whole affair worth watching.
minus-squareI Cast Fist@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 days agoIt does offer about the same amount of (in)action as 'murican handegg
minus-squaredmention7@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 days agoI remember reading an analysis of in-play vs idle time of several popular pro sports, and American football was dead last, even behind baseball. Which is fine on its own, but pretty ironic given how so many American football fans seem to sneer on soccer for being too boring.
minus-squareprimrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexuslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoWatching things you don’t understand is generally boring.
minus-squarepeoplebeproblems@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 days agoYou know I never understood the point of cheerleaders other than being fun to look at. Your explanation makes way more sense.
Man that’s similar to my take on baseball.
Tall, super-model-fit men swing wood at balls pitched by other men.
Straight guy who enjoys baseball here – youre not wrong!
At least baseball doesn’t need to have a squad of attractive women bouncing around in skirts on the sidelines to affirm the viewers’ sexuality.
I always thought they put them there because without them there’d literally be nothing about the whole affair worth watching.
It does offer about the same amount of (in)action as 'murican handegg
I remember reading an analysis of in-play vs idle time of several popular pro sports, and American football was dead last, even behind baseball.
Which is fine on its own, but pretty ironic given how so many American football fans seem to sneer on soccer for being too boring.
Watching things you don’t understand is generally boring.
You know I never understood the point of cheerleaders other than being fun to look at.
Your explanation makes way more sense.