• village604
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        I think an attachment would still count as the gun doing it.

        • laszlopanaflex@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 年前

          If we consider the gun ‘attached’ to the handler, would that put the blame back on the person? Or maybe we ought to consider the handler as part of the gun itself.

          • atomicorange@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 年前

            Neither the gun alone nor the person alone would have killed. Therefore, the dangerous thing is the COMBINATION of gun + person. In conclusion, we shouldn’t ban guns, just make it illegal for people to interact with them in any way.